Theosebeia - Revision history

פטר חמור at 23:15, 26 October 2020

2020-10-26T23:15:18Z

פטר חמור at 01:49, 10 January 2010

2010-01-10T01:49:21Z

פטר חמור at 01:34, 10 January 2010

2010-01-10T01:34:37Z

פטר חמור at 01:29, 10 January 2010

2010-01-10T01:29:30Z

פטר חמור at 01:13, 10 January 2010

2010-01-10T01:13:29Z

פטר חמור at 16:55, 22 August 2007

2007-08-22T16:55:26Z

פטר חמור at 18:55, 12 July 2007

2007-07-12T18:55:17Z

פטר חמור at 18:55, 12 July 2007

2007-07-12T18:55:02Z

New page

#redirect{{Noahism]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:15, 26 October 2020
Line 19:		Line 19:
	One branch of the Tsabians were King Herod's Hodites evicted from Jerusalem by the Romans. According to the Hodites of Mecca their scriptures stated that a Prophet would arise there who would bring about the dawn of a new aga and take them back to Jerusalem. "Synagogues" incorporating pagan motifs found all over the Holy Land are the last remnants of Herod's "Hodite" Tsabian community.		One branch of the Tsabians were King Herod's Hodites evicted from Jerusalem by the Romans. According to the Hodites of Mecca their scriptures stated that a Prophet would arise there who would bring about the dawn of a new aga and take them back to Jerusalem. "Synagogues" incorporating pagan motifs found all over the Holy Land are the last remnants of Herod's "Hodite" Tsabian community.

−	The most common form of σεβεια was a kind of syncretism. While the church draws a sharp distinction between Emperor Constantine and Julian the Apostate, there is no evidence that the religious beliefs of both men were not exactly the same. It is clear only that that their views on who exactly Jesus was differed, Constantine seeing him as an incarnation of Mithras, Julian seeing him as nothing but a 1st century Jewish teacher. Constantine was interested in bringing out Mithraic symbolism in rituals of Jewish origin, while Julian clearly respecting Jewish ritual saw no reason for syncretism and preferred not to blur the line between his own ~~ethnic~~ rituals and rituals of Jewish origin. This distinction makes Constantine the heretic from a Jewish perspective while Julian was firmly within ~~Theosebeia even though his ritual observances were further away from Judaism~~.	+	The most common form of σεβεια was a kind of syncretism. While the church draws a sharp distinction between Emperor Constantine and Julian the Apostate, there is no evidence that the religious beliefs of both men were not exactly the same. It is clear only that that their views on who exactly Jesus was differed, Constantine seeing him as an incarnation of Mithras, Julian seeing him as nothing but a 1st century Jewish teacher. Constantine was interested in bringing out Mithraic symbolism in rituals of Jewish origin, while Julian clearly respecting Jewish ritual saw no reason for syncretism and preferred not to blur the line between his own pagan rituals and rituals of Jewish origin. This distinction makes Constantine the heretic from a Jewish perspective while Julian was firmly within paganism.

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 Since there are no real coincidences, it is interesting to note the similarity between the sounds Theosebei and Thoshavi. Indeed [http://theosebeia.com/index.php/Prato_%26_Fratini#The_Hebrew_Root_SHUBH Prato and Fratini] have argued for an intentional comparative usage between the Greek root *σεβ and the Hebrew root *שב.
-Yet while Θεοσεβεια can be clearly identified with strict monotheism, the "La ilaha il allah" of σεβεια alone appears to refer more to a kind of shittuf or imperfect monotheism rather like trinitariansm. It recognises the supremacy of a divine force "Ton Theon or Allah, but it has not abandoned veneration of what are regarded as channels through which this force is revealed. This actually links σεβεια to صابئة or צבאות in Hebrew. All branches of σεβεια clearly had Messopotamian origins and reflect different cults of Enki. These were the Hindu-type of believer to whom Abraham was sent. The Magists had mixed their ideas with Buddhism. The Nasaraeans had mixed their ideas with Dualism. The Hodites had mixed their ideas with Judaism.
+Yet while Θεοσεβεια can be clearly identified with strict monotheism, the "La ilaha il allah" of σεβεια alone appears to refer more to a kind of shittuf or imperfect monotheism rather like trinitariansm. It recognises the supremacy of a divine force "Ton Theon" or "Al-Lah", but it has not abandoned veneration of what are regarded as channels through which this force is revealed. This actually links σεβεια to صابئة or צבאות in Hebrew. All branches of σεβεια clearly had Messopotamian origins and reflect different cults of Enki. These were the Hindu-type of believer to whom Abraham was sent. The Magists had mixed their ideas with Buddhism. The Nasaraeans had mixed their ideas with Dualism. The Hodites had mixed their ideas with Judaism.
 One branch of the Tsabians were King Herod's Hodites evicted from Jerusalem by the Romans. According to the Hodites of Mecca their scriptures stated that a Prophet would arise there who would bring about the dawn of a new aga and take them back to Jerusalem. "Synagogues" incorporating pagan motifs found all over the Holy Land are the last remnants of Herod's "Hodite" Tsabian community.
 The most common form of σεβεια was a kind of syncretism. While the church draws a sharp distinction between Emperor Constantine and Julian the Apostate, there is no evidence that the religious beliefs of both men were not exactly the same. It is clear only that that their views on who exactly Jesus was differed, Constantine seeing him as an incarnation of Mithras, Julian seeing him as nothing but a 1st century Jewish teacher. Constantine was interested in bringing out Mithraic symbolism in rituals of Jewish origin, while Julian clearly respecting Jewish ritual saw no reason for syncretism and preferred not to blur the line between his own ethnic rituals and rituals of Jewish origin. This distinction makes Constantine the heretic from a Jewish perspective while Julian was firmly within Theosebeia even though his ritual observances were further away from Judaism.

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 Since there are no real coincidences, it is interesting to note the similarity between the sounds Theosebei and Thoshavi. Indeed [http://theosebeia.com/index.php/Prato_%26_Fratini#The_Hebrew_Root_SHUBH Prato and Fratini] have argued for an intentional comparative usage between the Greek root *σεβ and the Hebrew root *שב.
-Yet while Θεοσεβεια can be clearly identified with strict monotheism, σεβεια alone appears to refer more to a kind of shittuf or imperfect monotheism rather like trinitariansm. This actually links σεβεια to صابئة or צבאות in Hebrew. All branches of σεβεια clearly had Messopotamian origins and reflect different cults of Enki. These were the Hindu-type of believer to whom Abraham was sent. The Magists had mixed their ideas with Buddhism. The Nasaraeans had mixed their ideas with Dualism. The Hodites had mixed their ideas with Judaism.
+Yet while Θεοσεβεια can be clearly identified with strict monotheism, the "La ilaha il allah" of σεβεια alone appears to refer more to a kind of shittuf or imperfect monotheism rather like trinitariansm. It recognises the supremacy of a divine force "Ton Theon or Allah, but it has not abandoned veneration of what are regarded as channels through which this force is revealed. This actually links σεβεια to صابئة or צבאות in Hebrew. All branches of σεβεια clearly had Messopotamian origins and reflect different cults of Enki. These were the Hindu-type of believer to whom Abraham was sent. The Magists had mixed their ideas with Buddhism. The Nasaraeans had mixed their ideas with Dualism. The Hodites had mixed their ideas with Judaism.
 One branch of the Tsabians were King Herod's Hodites evicted from Jerusalem by the Romans. According to the Hodites of Mecca their scriptures stated that a Prophet would arise there who would bring about the dawn of a new aga and take them back to Jerusalem. "Synagogues" incorporating pagan motifs found all over the Holy Land are the last remnants of Herod's "Hodite" Tsabian community.
 The most common form of σεβεια was a kind of syncretism. While the church draws a sharp distinction between Emperor Constantine and Julian the Apostate, there is no evidence that the religious beliefs of both men were not exactly the same. It is clear only that that their views on who exactly Jesus was differed, Constantine seeing him as an incarnation of Mithras, Julian seeing him as nothing but a 1st century Jewish teacher. Constantine was interested in bringing out Mithraic symbolism in rituals of Jewish origin, while Julian clearly respecting Jewish ritual saw no reason for syncretism and preferred not to blur the line between his own ethnic rituals and rituals of Jewish origin. This distinction makes Constantine the heretic from a Jewish perspective while Julian was firmly within Theosebeia even though his ritual observances were further away from Judaism.

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 Since there are no real coincidences, it is interesting to note the similarity between the sounds Theosebei and Thoshavi. Indeed [http://theosebeia.com/index.php/Prato_%26_Fratini#The_Hebrew_Root_SHUBH Prato and Fratini] have argued for an intentional comparative usage between the Greek root *σεβ and the Hebrew root *שב.
-Yet while Θεοσεβεια can be clearly identified with strict monotheism, σεβεια alone appears to refer more to a kind of shittuf or imperfect monotheism rather like trinitariansm. This actually links σεβεια to صابئة or צבאות in Hebrew. These were the Hindu-type of believer to whom Abraham was sent. One branch of the Tsabians were King Herod's Hodites evicted from Jerusalem by the Romans. According to the Hodites of Mecca their scriptures stated that a Prophet would arise there who would bring about the dawn of a new aga and take them back to Jerusalem. "Synagogues" incorporating pagan motifs found all over the Holy Land are the last remnants of Herod's "Hodite" Tsabian community.
+Yet while Θεοσεβεια can be clearly identified with strict monotheism, σεβεια alone appears to refer more to a kind of shittuf or imperfect monotheism rather like trinitariansm. This actually links σεβεια to صابئة or צבאות in Hebrew. All branches of σεβεια clearly had Messopotamian origins and reflect different cults of Enki. These were the Hindu-type of believer to whom Abraham was sent. The Magists had mixed their ideas with Buddhism. The Nasaraeans had mixed their ideas with Dualism. The Hodites had mixed their ideas with Judaism.
-The most common form of σεβεια was concerned with Mithras. While the church draws a sharp distinction between Emperor Constantine and Julian the Apostate, there is no evidence that the religious beliefs of both men were not exactly the same. It is clear only that that their views on who exactly Jesus was differed, Constantine seeing him as an incarnation of Mithras, Julian seeing him as nothing but a 1st century Jewish teacher. Constantine was interested in bringing out Mithraic symbolism in rituals of Jewish origin, while Julian clearly respecting Jewish ritual saw no reason for syncretism and preferred not to blur the line between his own ethnic rituals and rituals of Jewish origin. This distinction makes Constantine the heretic from a Jewish perspective while Julian was firmly within Theosebeia even though his ritual observances were further away from Judaism.
+One branch of the Tsabians were King Herod's Hodites evicted from Jerusalem by the Romans. According to the Hodites of Mecca their scriptures stated that a Prophet would arise there who would bring about the dawn of a new aga and take them back to Jerusalem. "Synagogues" incorporating pagan motifs found all over the Holy Land are the last remnants of Herod's "Hodite" Tsabian community.

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:13, 10 January 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	#~~redirect[[~~The ~~Bnai Noach Oath]]~~	+	(Θεο)σεβεια
		+	:Theosebeia (θεοσεβεια) Genesis 20:11 Job 28:28 Ecclesiasticus (Sirach) 1:25. 4 Maccabees 17:15
		+	:Theosebeias (θεοσεβειας) Baruch 5:4
		+	:Theosebeian (θεοσεβειαν) 4 Maccabees 7:6, 7:22 1 Timothy 2:10
		+	:Theosebis (θεοσεβης) Job 1:1, 1:8, 2:3 Judith 11:17 4 Maccabees 16:12 John 9:31
		+	:Theosebeis (θεοσεβεις) Exodus 18:21
		+	:Theosebous (θεοσεβους) 4 Maccabees 15:28
		+	:Sebomenoi (σεβομενοι) Wisdom of Solomon 15:6 Prayer of Azariah 1:68 (Daniel 3:90) 3 Maccabees 3:4
		+	:Sebomenois (σεβομενοις) Isaiah 66:14. Prayer of Azariah 1:10 (Daniel 3:33) Odes 7:8 (7:33) Acts 17:17
		+	:Sebomenwn (σεβομενων) Acts 13:43 Acts 17:4
		+	:Sebomai (σεβομαι) Jonah 1:9. Bel and the Dragon 1:5.
		+	:Sebomenas (Σεβόμενας) Acts 13:50.
		+	:Sebomene (σεβομενη) Acts 16:14
		+	:Sebomenou (σεβομενου) Acts 18:7
		+	Since there are no real coincidences, it is interesting to note the similarity between the sounds Theosebei and Thoshavi. Indeed [http://theosebeia.com/index.php/Prato_%26_Fratini#The_Hebrew_Root_SHUBH Prato and Fratini] have argued for an intentional comparative usage between the Greek root σεβ and the Hebrew root שב.
		+
		+	Yet while Θεοσεβεια can be clearly identified with strict monotheism, σεβεια alone appears to refer more to a kind of shittuf or imperfect monotheism rather like trinitariansm. This actually links σεβεια to صابئة or צבאות in Hebrew. These were the Hindu-type of believer to whom Abraham was sent. One branch of the Tsabians were King Herod's Hodites evicted from Jerusalem by the Romans. According to the Hodites of Mecca their scriptures stated that a Prophet would arise there who would bring about the dawn of a new aga and take them back to Jerusalem. "Synagogues" incorporating pagan motifs found all over the Holy Land are the last remnants of Herod's "Hodite" Tsabian community.
		+
		+	The most common form of σεβεια was concerned with Mithras. While the church draws a sharp distinction between Emperor Constantine and Julian the Apostate, there is no evidence that the religious beliefs of both men were not exactly the same. It is clear only that that their views on who exactly Jesus was differed, Constantine seeing him as an incarnation of Mithras, Julian seeing him as nothing but a 1st century Jewish teacher. Constantine was interested in bringing out Mithraic symbolism in rituals of Jewish origin, while Julian clearly respecting Jewish ritual saw no reason for syncretism and preferred not to blur the line between his own ethnic rituals and rituals of Jewish origin. This distinction makes Constantine the heretic from a Jewish perspective while Julian was firmly within Theosebeia even though his ritual observances were further away from Judaism.

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:55, 22 August 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	#redirect[[~~Noahism~~]]	+	#redirect[[The Bnai Noach Oath]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:55, 12 July 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	#redirect{{Noahism]]	+	#redirect[[Noahism]]