The phrase Tayyaye or Taji (tʾcyk'''Tajh of Mehmet''' refers to ) were a North Arabian Tribe associated with Adoptionism from the '''Messianic Mithraists''' Formerly Roman Province of [[Tachkastan]] who had been united to the [[proto-Karaites]] as [[Hagarim]] which was conquered by [[Mehmet Ismaili]], the first known '''Tajh of Mehmet''' named by [[Sebeos]]Persians in 610AD.
[[Mehmet Ismaili]] could have been The Tayyaye were Christians according to John of the historical 7th century figure behind Sedre and the Standard Islamic legends of [[Iyas ibn Qabisa]] and [[Muhammad ibn Abdullah]]Narrative. But he MHMT is not the [[Mehmet]] Pahlavi name for whom Jesus Patibilis, the '''Tajh of Mehmet''' are namedBeithEl.
The word phrase '''Tayyaye of Mahmet''' refers to '''Messianic Mithraists''' of [[MehmetTachkastan]] is who had been united to the Persian form of [[Mohmadproto-Karaites]] as [[Hagarim]], the by Arabian Gnostic proto-Karaite known by name for as [[Jesus PatibilisMahmet Ismaili]], which derives from the Hebrew word according to [[Sebeos]]. [[MahmadFredgar]] used to refer to indicates that they were integrated with the Temple part Saracens (Pahlavis) of Ercolia who Khosrow II sent with the L-rd as Bridegroom mentioned Jews to conquer Jerusalem in Jewish sources610.
The ethnonym "Tajh" was pronounced approximately as "Taye" by Afroasiatics and approximately as "Tazik" by Indoeuropeans and "Tashih" in Chinese sources. Soghdian[[Mahmet Ismaili]] could have been the historical 7th century figure behind the Islamic legends of [[Al-Manichean sources call them "Tazigan" Iyas ibn Qabisa]] and consider them to have been a related Gnostic group[[Muhammad ibn Abdullah]]. Those that later arrived in Romania were called "Tzigane"But he is not the [[Mahmet]] for whom the '''Tayyaye of Mahmet''' are named.
The word [[Mahmet]] is the Persian form of [[Mohmad]], the Arabian Gnostic name for [[Jesus Patibilis]], which derives from the Hebrew word [[Mahmad]] used to refer to the Temple part of the L-rd as Bridegroom mentioned in Jewish sources. From 632 until 680 the "Mahmet People" were commanded by the proto-Karaite Alids. We hear of the '''Tayyaye of Mahmet''' Hagarim from Thomas the Presbyter when they were fighting (in alliance with the proto-Karaite Bakr family's Khalid) against the Romans in 634 just 12 miles east of Gaza. In 636, the proto-Karaite Bakr family's Emir accepted the surrender of Yazdegard's Sassanians who assisted him in conquering Syria where they rose in prominence as the Quraysh Hagarim. Meanwhile the proto-Karaite Alids' Ercolian-Pahlavi Hagarim rose in the East to establish their Imamate in Persia. The standard Islamic Narrative places the origin of the Quran under the Bakr's Quraysh Hagarite Uthman while the two factions were still united. Then in 656 a civil war broke out between the Bakrs' Quraysh Hagarim and the Alids' Pahlavi Hagarim. The proto-Karaite Bakr family were conquered by the '''Tayyaye of Mahmet''' Hagarim while the Bakrs' Quraysh Hagarim withdrew to fortify themselves in Syria. In 680 the Quraysh Hagarim of Syria assasinated the Alids of the New Persian Empire giving the proto-Karaite Bakr Family an opportunity to take back control of the Empire again promoting Uthman's Quran until Abdul Malik succeeded in imposing the rule of the Quraysh Hagarim in 692 AD. Abdul Malik decided that it was in his best interest to revise the religion to abolish the importance of the proto-Karaites. A new Qibla in the Hejaz was established. The Quran was revised. Under the rule of the Quraysh, the Persian cavalries were abolished and Messianic Mithraism evolved into Islam as we know it. The ethnonym "Tayyaye" was pronounced approximately as "Taye" by Afroasiatics and approximately as "Tazik" by Indoeuropeans and "Tashih" in Chinese sources. Soghdian-Manichean sources call them "Tazigan" and consider them to have been a related Gnostic group. Those that later arrived in Romania were called "Tzigane". The following chronology of sources aims to help us understand the story of the '''Tajh Tayyaye of MehmetMahmet'''.
=591 Haninai Executed (Karaite)=
On the 2nd of March in 610 Gabriel the Khalifah in the Roman Province of Tachkastan notices that Mars appears as the tip of the Crescent moon falling slowly to the earth and is taken as an omen of War coming from Sassan.
:(Quran 54:1 Moon Breaks).
Khosrow II sends his [[Ercolian Jewish Jew]]ish army from Ercolia and their Ma'amad to invade Roman Mesopotamia killing Anastasius Patriarch of Antioch and the Romans are defeated.
:(Quran 30:2)
The Judeo-Baptist Gnostics of Tachkastan submit to the [[Ercolian Jews ]] who secure their Ma'amad in Edessa employing the Judeo-Baptist Gnostic Poet Gabriel Al-Khalifah as a messenger.
The murder of Anastasius II (the younger) of Antioch prevents his Nestorians having any dyophysites leaders in his Empire and increases even more the Acephalians in Khosrau's empire which is fully utilised by the Miaphysites to their advantage.
=622 New Era (Numismatics)=
Heraclius founded Monoenergism to unite his empire in 622 by convincing the Arsacids that Ieso was Mithras. Khosrow proclaims himself God of Gods and strips all religious symbolism off of his coins leaving only his own image. This greatly upsets not only the '''Tajh Tayyaye of Mehmet''' but also many other citizens of Persiaboth Pahlavi and Persic (e.g. Salman of Pars) alike. The Imperial Lion-Man Heraclius begins his campaign against Khosrou II and is declared August Heraclius even by the '''Tajh Tayyaye of Mehmet''' and other citizens of Persia. Heraclius evicts the Qurayza from Edessa but offers them a stash of weapons and an Imperial Basalt Stele promising them the Desert (interpreted by the Qurayza as [https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/the-arabah Arabah]) if they can take it from Khosrow.
"When the Emperor Heraclius in the course of the war which he began about 619, came to Theodosiopolis (Erzeroum) in Armenia (about 622), a Monophysite named Paul, a leader of the Acephali, made a speech before him in favour of his heresy. The emperor refuted him with theological arguments, and incidentally made use of the expression "one operation" of Christ."
Heraclius refutes the Acephali and decrees all people in his empire should unite in religion under his own version of Monophsitism which he calls Monoenergism.
[[Gabriel ibn Khalifah al-Kalbi]] raised [[Mehmet Ismaili]] into to Mahmoudan status and so that he can join his [[mamed]] as a Mahmoud and so that Mithraic Arab Ali could marry Mehmet's daughter Fatima.
Mehmet Ismaili helps the Qurayza to conquer the Sassanians hoping that he has the influence to raise an army of [[Hagarim]] in Tachkastan for them to take the Arabah.
Honorius I becomes Pope on the 27th of October.
Mithrean Mithraic Arab Ali marries Fatima.
=Dhū-Qār 624=
=633 Khalid conquers Al-Hira (SIN)=
The [[Bakr Proto-Karaites]] of Al-Hira appeal to Khalid's [[Quraysh]] for help. Khalid's Quraysh conquer Al-Hira's '''Tajh Tayyaye of Mehmet'''.
The Mithrean Mithraic Arab Alids soon begin minting Persian coins.
=634 Tayyaye d'MHMT (Thomas the Presbyter)=
The '''Tajh Tayyaye of Mehmet''' stationed 12 miles east of Gaza fall under the control of Khalid who orders them to fight the Romans at this time as they try to re-take the lands for the Saracens which the Saracens had only just recently lost to Heraclius.
Yazdegard betrayed Heraclius by surrendering to Quraysh. Under the Quraysh, a marriage is arranged between Prince Shahriyar's daughter Shahrbonu and the Mithrean Mithraic Arab Ali's son Husseyn putting him in line for the Persian Throne.
Quraysh proceeded to take the Holy Land under the Bakr Proto-Karaites of Iraq until Umar came to power.
=641 Constans (Byzantine Records)=
Constans ascends the Byzantine throne.
=641=
Heraclius then his co-heirs all die in swift sequence.
*P
The Arab Empire will continue to put them on their coins for decades to come to remind everyone that it was Heraclius who had given them an imperial mandate carved in black stone.
*N+O
=644 Emir Umayr=
An 874 manuscript titled Disputation of John and the Emir it is recorded that on the 9th of May 644, and the Emir Umayr ibn Sad al-As arise invited the Syriac Orthodox Patriarch John III of the Sedre to explain the Byzantine faith to him. The Byzantines praised his efforts. At the Emir's request, John also had the Gospel translated from Syriac into Arabic by Arab Christians from the Banu Uqayl, Tanukh, and Tayy (Tashih/Tachk/Tajik) tribes. It is alleged that the emir had initially demanded that mentions of the name of Christ, the baptism, and the Cross be removed from the translation, but relented following John's refusal. The request to remove the title Christ and the Cross indicates the Emir was influenced by Judaism. He did not believe Jesus was Christ and did not want the Jews blamed for crucifixion.
Following conversation with John Sedre Emir Umayr asks the Taji to translate the Gospels into Arabic, but not the Quran.
Taken altogether the evidence suggests that Umar worked for Heraclius as proto-Karaite or a secular Teimani (or Judaized gentile) but one who was more attracted to Miaphysitism.
It is also said that Yazdegard daughter called Dara was pledged to Bostanai at this time.
=644 Uthman (SIN)=
=648 Typos Offends (Numismatics/Church History)=
Tyops Typos of Constans replaces Ecthesis. The Typos of Constans was issued to suppress discussion over Nasrani-Monothelitism. It is opposed by Quraysh as well as by Pope Martin of Gaza.
Quraysh refuse to put Constans on their Drahmas.
=651 Persian Imamate Portrait of Mithraic Arab Ali=
[[image:651ad.png|thumb|left|Ali]]
This 651CE coin from Bishapur with the Arabic phrase "Bismillah" on it shows that there was a an Arabian religious change in the leadership of the Persian Empire but which had no impact on Numismatics in , clearly therefore independent , Syria. The differences in currency corroborates the Shia narrative that Mithraic Arab Ali ruled the Persian Empire as an Imamate while the non-believing Umayyads ruled in Syria. The coin also confirms the Spiritual Shia view that depicting Mithraic Arab Ali's face has never been a problem for the real Quran-obedient community and Iconoclasm is really just a puritanical "Holier-than-thou" innovation. Retaining the depiction of the two Priests either side of an altar on the reverse of the coin shows that a kind of Mithraism was actually the religion of Mithraic Arab Ali and the Imamate's Quranic materials plagiarised by Uthman. But where is the word Mithras in the Quran? The only possible conclusion is that the religion Mithraic Arab Ali promoted was a form of Mithraism where the prophecies concerning Mithra as an Aeon of G-d are equated with those concerning the Messiah and that the community saw these those prophesies fulfilled in Marym's son Ieso. In order to turn Mithreans into Noahites it would have been necessary , and therefore in the Jews ' best interests , to promote the idea that a Jewish Polemicist sage had fulfilled the Mithraic propheciesin a way which was considered compatible with Judaism. This is the only rational conclusion which can be derived from bringing together knowledge of the following factors::01) The 651 Arab-Sassanian Coinage:02) The Pseudo-Byzantine Coinage from 638 until Abdul Malik:03) John of the Sedre's experience with the Emir:04) Sebeos's account:05) Pope Martin I's defence:06) The original Quranic materials:07) The Spiritual Shia Narrative:08) Judaism:09) The Nativity:10) The concept of Jesus Patibilis in the Tripartite Gnostic Christ.From this conclusion we can then delve more deeply into the issue of who Mehmet was. It becomes clear that he was not attempting to establish a new religion but was a Proselyte attempting to assist his proto-Karaite Mullas in reforming an old one along Noahite lines. Despite his Messianic name he did not consider himself to be the Messiah though outsiders were unable to distinguish between him and the Mithraic Messiah he promoted because of his Gnostic Noahite name.
The Byzantines arrest Pope Martin accusing him of providing the Quraysh a 'Tomus' concerning "what they should believe" and sentence him to death. Pope Martin.
Pope Martin did not instruct Uthman nor any other Quraysh concerning what they should believe concerning Ieso as Messiah because Muawiya does not have any such ideas later. But it may be that there was some kind of communique between Martin and the Mithraic Arab Alids concerning whatever they had that became Quranic materials. Otherwise, where did the Byzantines get this idea from?
The available evidence does not fit the SIN that Uthman played any significant role in standardising the Quraysh Quran. In contradiction to the Quran, the Emir before Uthman did not know Ieso as Messiah and Muawiya after Uthman did not know Ieso as Messiah. If Uthman believed in the miraculously born Messiah Ieso of the Quran, then his belief must have been only a generally unknown personal one which appears did not make any impact on the Umayyads until about 30 years later.
However, the charges brought against Martin show that Christian-like Quranic materials in use among the Muslims were obviously known to the Byzantines at this time but if tolerated were clearly not an Umayyad approved belief (let alone promoted) until about 30 years later during the reign of Abdul Malik.
Perhaps the word Masih used in the Quran is the Hebrew word for "distracterPolemicist" referring to [[Plony Yeshu HaNotzri Ben Stada]] neither words being equated with the Christian Messia Ieso? But if that were the case, it is inconceivable that the Byzantines could imagine such a belief being approved by Pope Martin for the Saracens and they would certainly have charged Martin with apostasy instead.
Then perhaps the communication suggested by the Byzantines only involved Monothelite Maronite Nasara as the subjects of the Umayyad state? But if that were the case, there is no known Tomus which the Byzantines could have been referring to, and surely Martin could have made an attempt to explain this in his defence.
Or one might instead imagine that the first historical Emir just wanted to know what Plony Ben Stada had learned from the Injeel, but then any basis for communication between Uthman and Martin collapses and the Byzantine charge must relate to a communique between Martin and Mulims other than the Umayyads.
The simplest conclusion is that while the Umayyad state may very well have accepted [[Plony Yeshu HaNotzri Ben Stada]] as a Hebrew Masih (distracterPolemicist) it was not the Umayyads who had any kind of communication with Pope Martin concerning their Tomus. The SIN concerning the Uthmanic Quran Controversy must therefore be considered "Fake News". The Umayyads must have been introduced to such Quranic materials from a source other than Uthman and at a much later date.
If Uthman was a believer in Quranic materials then it was not something he boasted about to other Umayyads and if there was any communication between Uthman and Pope Martin then Uthman did it secretly and his "Quran" was likely just some materials which he had taken from the [[Mithrean Mithraic Arab Alids]].
=655 Battle of Masts (A J Deus)=
This also contradicts with the idea that Quraysh were Monothelites rather than completely non-Christian. It looks more like they simply had a treaty with Monothelites rather than with other Christians. How is it then that Monothelitism (one human will) became the standard Islamic doctrine?
If the first historical Emir did not consider Ieso to be Messiah and then the third (Muawiya) didn't either, it is rather inconceivable that the standard narrative concerning the Quraysh Quran collection could be true. Muawiya had either never heard what Uthman's Quran says or he was an apostate from Uthman's religion who warred against the Mithraic Arab Alids.
In conclusion it is safe to say that the Quranic materials were not held by the first historical Emir's daughter (Hafsa) nor assembled into the Quraysh Quran by any caliph after him before Muawiya.
The only conclusion is that the Quranic materials were only popular in the area of the Mithraic Arab Alids into whose religion Abdul Malik almost converted but also incorporated his Maronites' Nasrani-Monothelite Christology.
=660 Muawiya (SIN)=
Ali and Hassan killed.
Sebeos indicates that the Caliphate is a satellite of the Antichrist and depicts Muawiya as rejecting Christ, but according to other sources, Muawiya's daughter was baptised. He also prayed at the tomb of Mary in Gethsemane and at the Church of the Holy Sepulchre after being entering alliance with Byzantines and being crowned king of Jerusalem It seems Muawiya, despite his earlier beliefs was a convert to something recognisable as Christianity.
https://www.cngcoins.com/Coin.aspx?CoinID=372388
=669?=
=679=
Byzantium conquers Umayyads, but not the Mithraic Arab Alid Imamate.
=680 Ibn Al-Zubayir (Numismatics)=
[[Image:BanuBakr.jpg|thumb|left|Ibn Al-Zubair]]
Muawiya dies. Muawiya's son like the rest of the Quraysh did not honour the acknowledgment of Husseyn as Caliph and have Husseyn killed leaving the Alid Mithreans Mithraic Arab Alids almost extinct.
Muawiya's capitulation to Byzantium and the murder of Hussein lead to the rebellion of most of the Empire under the [[Bakr Proto-Karaites of Iraq]] led by ibn Al-Zubayr as Persian Emperor.
=700 Abu HaShem=
Under their [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abd_Allah_ibn_Muhammad_ibn_al-Hanafiyyah 5th Imam, Abd Allah ibn Muhammad ibn al-Hanafiyyah] , the Mawali became the Hashimites.
=703=
Salman's Asawira unit from the Sassanian Army are disbanded by Al-Hajjaj ibn Yusuf.
=705 Caucasian Albania=
The founder of the Abbasid dynasty was Muhammad Al-Imam who took control in 716. He tried to unite the Mawali and the Sunnis.
Under Abbasid influence a new Quran using materials from the Umayyads "book of the Arabs" and from the Mawali's [[Ahsana al-Hadith ]] was composed.
Ultimately the Abbasid attempt at egalitarianism backfired. No doubt the Arabs would never have come on board if they felt they did not own the revelation. So the Abbasids granted them that but in the end their attempt to unite the Arabs and Mawali inevitably kept the religious views of Mawali suppressed in exchange for higher social status. Hence the Sufi circles have never really had any regard for Islam.
"It was ‘Umar, Abu Turab and Salman the Persian who composed your Furqan, even though the rumour has got around among you that God sent it down from the heavens…. As for your [Book], you have already given us examples of such falsifications and one knows among others of a certain Hajjaj, named by you as governor of Persia, who had men gather your ancient books, which he replaced by others composed by himself according to his taste and which he disseminated everywhere in your nation, because it was easier by far to undertake such a task among a people speaking a single language. From this destruction, nonetheless, there escaped a few of the works of Abu Turab, for Hajjaj could not make them disappear completely."
This may be why Mithraic Arab Ali and Salman are so important to the Alawaites. This may also explain why he is said to have translated the Quran into Persian, thus becoming the first person to interpret and translate the Quran into a foreign language. Perhaps in reality the existence of the Quran in Persian was simply explained away by accrediting him as the translator. He is buried in Old Medina. The Armenian Historian Tovma Artsruni repeats Leo Isaurian's opinion later by stating that Mahmet summoned Salman and attached himself to him::"...and ordered him to write (the Kuran) a book of laws for his nation at the hand of Abut'uraba the Ismaelite ; for he himself did not know writing or reading. Salman agreed to write for him and set down a composite book , some of it from accurate memory , other parts being imaginary sayings "(History of the House of the Artsrunikʻ - Page 168)
It seems that Leo III made serious investigations about the Quran. He may have gained his knowledge from the Paulicians of Genesius Timothy whom he protected. He identified key companions by name , and he even knew that Hajjaj The General of Abdel Malik Ibn Marwan intoduced some changes to the Quran, a fact attested in muslim sources like "The Book of Masahif" of Ibn Abi Dawood.
=781 Timothy I of Baghdad=
Nestorian Catholics Timothy I of Baghdad provides us with perhaps the first documented exegesis of the Abbasid Quran.
Timothy hints that there was no prophet Muhammad only Eliyas.
Many standard Islamic Doctrines seem to have emerged as attempts to respond to Timothy's exegesis.
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/bpilant613/public_html/w/extensions/MobileFrontend/includes/diff/InlineDiffFormatter.php:103) in /home/bpilant613/public_html/w/includes/WebResponse.php on line 42
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/bpilant613/public_html/w/extensions/MobileFrontend/includes/diff/InlineDiffFormatter.php:103) in /home/bpilant613/public_html/w/includes/WebResponse.php on line 42
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/bpilant613/public_html/w/extensions/MobileFrontend/includes/diff/InlineDiffFormatter.php:103) in /home/bpilant613/public_html/w/includes/WebResponse.php on line 42
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/bpilant613/public_html/w/extensions/MobileFrontend/includes/diff/InlineDiffFormatter.php:103) in /home/bpilant613/public_html/w/includes/WebResponse.php on line 42 Changes - Wikinoah English
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/bpilant613/public_html/w/extensions/MobileFrontend/includes/diff/InlineDiffFormatter.php:103) in /home/bpilant613/public_html/w/includes/WebResponse.php on line 42
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/bpilant613/public_html/w/extensions/MobileFrontend/includes/diff/InlineDiffFormatter.php:103) in /home/bpilant613/public_html/w/includes/WebResponse.php on line 42
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/bpilant613/public_html/w/extensions/MobileFrontend/includes/diff/InlineDiffFormatter.php:103) in /home/bpilant613/public_html/w/includes/WebResponse.php on line 42
