This article theorizes that '''DIHYAH's FATHER KHALIFAH AL-KALBI''' was '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nehemiah_ben_Hushiel NEHEMIAH BEN HUSHIEL]''' the chief [[mamed]] of a Proto-Karaite sect that recruited a type of Noahite (Tsabi) called Hagarim from among the mainly Zoroastrian, [[Manichaeans]] and other Gnostics (Hanifs) such as the Harranian Quraysh. One of those Noahites was to be [[Mehmet the Ishmaelite]]. Hod Shebe Malkhut
:'''NOAHITES (HAGARIM)ALSADIQIN'''It should be noted, that Judaism does not mind whether there is any truth or not to what nonthe sect of the '''Sadducees''' -Jews believe as long as their beliefs are compatible with Judaismpossibly from Hebrew '''Tsdoki''' צדוקי [{{IPA|sˤə. Noahite faiths are always artificial constructionsðo. The reason is because it is assumed all religions come from Noah anyway so they are all nothing but corruptons 'qi}}], whence '''Zadokites''' or preservations of other variants - was founded in the Truth. Hence all one needs to do 2nd century BCE, possibly as a political party, and continued to find exist sometime after the Truth again is redeem 1st century only under the corrupted faith name of Ishmaelites. They were mainly Nabatean Ishmaelite Hagarim converted to Judaism by correction/redaction/editing Alexander Jannaeus.<ref>Johnson, Paul (1987). A History of those elements which are incompatiblethe Jews. In ths sense, if that is what an Arabian man did to Arabian Gnosticism then he would London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson. ISBN 978-0-297-79091-4.</ref> Modern Sadducees have been considered as having done God's work from a Jewish point usurped the identity of view. However, we can the Karaite Jews though they do not know if this happened because all we have is Uthman's work and hold to the opinions Mishnaic beliefs of Islamic historiansthe early Karaites.
:The Hebrew language name, Tsdoki, indicates their claim that they are the followers of the teachings of the High Priest Tsadok, often spelled Zadok (High Priest), who anointed Solomon king at the start of the Solomon's Temple. However, Rabbinic tradition suggests that they were ''DIHYAH'S FAMILY''not'The identification of Dihyah's Father Khalifah Al-Kalbi with Nehemiah ben Hushiel comes from named after the fact that the only person in history known to High Priest Zadok, but rather another Zadok (who may still have been referred to by a word meaning Khalifah before Abu Bakr was Nehemiah ben Hushiel who is called Caliph (Ostikanpriest) in Armenian. The Standard Islamic Narrative (SIN) that the Gabriel , who used to teach rebelled against the Quranic Materials looked practically identical to Dihyah himselfteachings of Antigonus of Soko, leaves us only with a government official of Judea in the rational dedcuction that he must have been 3rd century BC and a very close genetic relative to Dihyah like Father or twin Brother since Dihyah was too young to have a son old enough to fit the role. If Dihya's Father was Nehemiah ben Hushiel, then predecessor of the Gabriel in question must have been Dihyah's probably Twin-BrotherRabbinic tradition.
:'''QURAYZA'''This article also theorizes that it is very possible While little or none of their own writings have been preserved, the Sadducees seem to have indeed been a priestly group, associated with the leadership of the Temple in Jerusalem. Possibly, Sadducees represent the aristocratic clan of the Hasmonean kohen, who replaced the previous high priestly lineage that had allowed the Syrian Emperor Antiochus IV Epiphanes to desecrate the sect Temple of proto-Karaites we are referring Jerusalem with idolatrous sacrifices and to were martyr monotheistic Jews. The Jewish holiday of Hanukkah celebrates the ousting of the Syrian forces, the rededication of the '''QURAYZA''' who joined Temple, and the Parthian Allies installment of Heraclius in 622 against Sassan until they were exterminated the new Hasmonean priestly line. The Hasmoneans ruled as "priest-kings", claiming both titles high priest and king simultaneously, and like other aristocracies across the Hellenistic world became increasingly influenced by [[Mehmet Hellenistic syncretism and Greek philosophies: presumably Stoicism, and apparently Epicureanism if the Talmudic tradition criticizing the anti-Torah philosophy of the Ishmaelite]] in 627 in "Apikorsus" אפיקורסוס (i.e., Epicurus) refers to the Hasmonean clan qua Sadducees. Like Epicureans, Sadducees rejected the tragic irony existence of using their own words against theman afterlife, sickening many thus denied the Pharisaic doctrine of the Resurrection of his followers who had worked out that Gabriel was not a messenger from heaven but in reality just a messenger from the QurayzaDead.
:'''QURAYZA BELIEFS'''Nehemiah Ben Hushiel's QurayzaThe Dead Sea Scrolls community, like all Proto-Karaites were Hebrews, but not regular Jews.who are probably [[https://www.economist.com/middle-east-and-africa/2013/05/18/whos-a-jewEssenes]] They , were related led by a high priestly leadership, who are thought to be the Samaritans and Falashahs etc., and like descendents of the Samaritans and Falashahs etc."legitimate" high priestly lineage, considered themselves spiritual inheritors of which the earthly Kingdom of IsraelHasmoneans ousted. Like their relatives, they often (but not always) harboured a degree of disrespect towards regular Jews whom they regard as elitist snobs. Christians did not refer to Arabia as ferax heresium (Mother of Heresies) for nothing and Proto-Karaites came in all sorts: [[Ananites]]; [[Ukbarites]]; [[Isawites]]; [[Essenes]]; [[Ebionites]]; [[Nazarenes]]; [[Nasoreans]]; [[Ekhasites]]; [[Sadducees]]; The Dead Sea Scrolls bitterly opposed the list is endless. Each sect had its own peculiar set current high priests of beliefs. Some, like the Ukbarites, were like Messianic Jews or NasaraTemple. Abu Hanifa can certainly be regarded as Since Hasmoneans constituted a kind of proto-Karaite whose distinguishing beliefs included acceptance of the New Testament and the Islamic Ieso as G-ddifferent priestly line, it was in their political interest to emphasize their family's Aeon (Rasul) and G-d's Word (Kalim) and Spirit priestly pedigree that descended from G-d (Ruh) born of a virgin (Marym). Just like other proto-Karaitestheir ancestor, the high priest Zadok, his sect also who had a complex view of certain other Jewish sects some of which they regarded as fellow Guides and some of which they referred to as Judas (Yahud) while trying to gain adherents from the Bani Israel (Zera Israel people). Abu Hanifa seems authority to have preserved this tradition while starving to death in prison where he helped Anan ben David establish anoint the Ananite sect obviously not regarding him as a Judas. Specificallykingship of Solomon, the term Judas seems to have originally referred only to ex-Christians who had abandoned Ieso for forms son of Judaism which regard every Ezrakh as a child of GodDavid.
:'''QURAYZA NOAHITES'''As Most of what is known about the QurayzaSadducees comes from Josephus, who wrote that they were a quarrelsome group whose followers were wealthy and powerful, and that he considered them boorish in social interactions (see Josephus's Noahites it was natural for Hagarim to look-up to [http://www.gutenberg.org/catalog/world/readfile?fk_files=2529&pageno=105 Wars of the proto-Karaites for guidance referring to them as [[Alazeena Haadu]Jews, Book II, Chapter VIII, Paragraph 14]). The Noahites regarded themselves as Sarah's Kin and as very distinct We know something of them from their Arab subjects. Even discussions in the Talmud (mainly the Jerusalem), the heavily Arabized [[Quraysh]] Hagarim did not consider themselves Arabs whom they looked down upon as core work of Rabbinic literature Judaism, which is based on the worst hypocrites and disbelieversteachings of Pharisee Judaism.
:'''QURAYZA QURAN'''== Beliefs ==Because Nehemiah ben Hushiel's sect of proto-Karaites that Abu Hanifa descended from spoke Imperial Aramaic and Pahlavi they were readers Sadducees rejected certain beliefs of the Imperial Aramaic Targumim Pharisaic interpretation of the Hebrew Miqra which in Aramaic is called Torah. They rejected the Kareyana from which comes Pharisaic tenet of an oral Torah, and interpreted the Arabic word Koranverses literally. The Hebrew Miqra predated In their personal lives this often meant a more stringent lifestyle, as they did away with the Tanakh which was only canonized around 200CEability to interpret.
:'''QURAYSH QURANR'Yitchak Isaac Halevi suggests that while there is evidence of a Sadducee sect from the times of Ezra, It emerged as major force only after the Hashmenite rebellion. The reason for this was not, in fact, a matter of religion. He claims that as complete rejection of Judaism would not have been tolerated under the Hasmonean rule, the Hellenists joined the Sadducees maintaining that they were rejecting not Judaism but Rabbinic law. Thus, the Sadducees were for the most part a political party not a religious sect (Dorot Ha'Rishonim). However there is evidence<ref>Cf., for one example of a sect that could have represented a Sadducee schism and did believe in Angels, the Afterlife, etc.: Lawrence H. Schiffman, 'One The Sadducean Origins of the QurayzaDead Sea Scroll Sect's Noahite tribes was , in <i>Understanding the Quraysh who had originally been ZoroastriansDead Sea Scrolls</i>, ed. H. Shanks, New York: Random House, 1993, pp. 35-49. Long after It is widely known that the demise authors of the QurayzaDead Sea Scrolls never recognizably refer to themselves as "Essenes"—possibly due to the fact that they wrote mainly in Hebrew and Aramaic, whereas we have the term "Essenes" from Greek—but they do refer to themselves in various places as the Quraysh became more influential"Zadokites"/"Sons of Zadok", they decided which term is apparently identical to gather and translate that by which the Sadducees identified themselves. Among other arguments for a Sadducean Essene origin, Schiffman also cites interpretations of the purity regulations which closely parallel Sadducean views recorded by the vanishing Targumim into Intelligible Arabic but most spiritual heirs of the Targums had already been lost so [[Pharisees]], who authored the Talmud.</ref> that there was an internal schism among those called "Sadducees" - some who rejected Angels, the Soul, and Resurrection - and some which accepted these teachings and the Quraysh might have ended up inventing a lot entirety of it as they went alongthe Hebrew Bible.
:'''SALAT'''While many Noahites themselves (being from Christian backgrounds) observed In regard to criminal jurisdiction they were so rigorous that the Divine Office of the Liturgy of Hours (day on which became their code was abolished by the 5 prayer times) Pharisaic Sanhedrin under Simeon ben Shetah's leadership, during the proto-Karaites only practiced Salat 3 times reign of Salome Alexandra, was celebrated as a dayfestival. The Qurayza used Sadducees are said to perform Havdalah have insisted on the literal execution of the law of retaliation: "Eye for eye, tooth for tooth", which pharisaic Judaism, and later rabbinic Judaism, rejected. On the Hagarim but this was eventually lost although other hand, they would not inflict the death penalty on false witnesses in a form was revived by certain Alidscase where capital punishment had been wrongfully carried out, unless the accused had been executed solely in consequence of the testimony of such witnesses.
:'''MAMED'''According to the Talmud, they granted the daughter the same right of inheritance as the son in case the son was dead.(see chapter Yeish Nochalin of the Babylonain Talmud, tractate Bava Batra)Some proto-Karaites were governed by a clerical office called a MaSee however Emet L'amad[https://wwwYaakov over there who explains that the focus of their argument was theological.bookgallery.co.il/content/hebrew/bookpageschema.asp?BookPageID=160101] or Hakhamate perhaps originally under Nehemiah ben Hushiel who The question was appointed by Khosrow following his execution whether there is an "Afterlife" (see above) and thus the dead person can act as a chain on the line of [[Exilarch Haninai]] in 591inheritance as if he was alive.
According to the Talmud, they contended that the seven weeks from the first barley-sheaf-offering ("omer") to Shavuot (Pentecost in Christian reference) should, according to Leviticus 23:'''NABI'''Just like 15-16, be counted from "the [[Isawites]]day after Sabbath, " and for claiming descent fron Abraham, consequently, that Shavuot should always be celebrated on the Qurayza referred to their Hakhamate as first day of the "Nabi" week (Abraham HanifaMeg. Ta'an. i.; Men. 65a) and there were very particular marriage rules . In this they followed a literal reading of the Bible which applied to regards the festival of the Nabi Clerical Class also known firstlings as having no direct connection with Passover, while the Pharisees, connecting the festival of the Exodus with the festival of the Ahl ulBayt. The rules were similar to giving of the Law, interpreted the "morrow after the [[Yukhasin]] categories observed by other Jews and to those which pertained Sabbath" to signify the Feudal class in Europesecond day of Passover.
:'''VARIOUS OTHER PROTO-KARAITE IDEAS'''As mentioned above, there were an endless supply if ideas from In regard to rituals at the Proto-Karaite groups. To cover them all Temple in detail is beyond the scope of this work. Only those which appear to be relevant to our story shoukd be mentioned. Jerusalem:
One such idea suggests * They held that Idumeans as people of Esau accepted Christianity regarding Ieso as a sort of "Moses" for the children of Esau in much daily burnt offerings were to be offered by the high priest at his own expense, whereas the same way Pharisees contended that Moses was accepted they were to be furnished as by a national sacrifice at the children cost of Jacob as their special prophet. According to the same theory, Hagar's children Temple treasury into which taxes were also awaiting their "Moses"paid.
Other proto-Karaites would have considered * They held that Ieso in the Quran refers not meal offering belonged to [[Rebbe Yehoshuah Minzaret]] but to [[Plony Yeshu HaNotzri Ben Stada]] who they nick-named in Hebrew "'''מסיח'''" meaning "distracting" not regarding him as Moshia' (Messiah). That has become the standard medieval Karaite view. This idea was coupled by others with the idea that he should regarded as G-dpriest's Messenger to the Idumeans and later also the idea that [[Mehmet portion; whereas the Ishmaelite]] should be regarded as G-d's Messenger to Pharisees claimed it for the Ishmaelitesaltar.
All sorts * They insisted on an especially high degree of ideas held by purity in those who officiated at the various proto-Karaite sects could have easily transferred onto preparation of the Qurayza's Hagarim after ashes of the male Qurayza were eliminated forcing Hagarim to look to others if Alazeena Haadu for guidanceRed Heifer. The Pharisees, by contrast, opposed such strictness.
=591 Haninai Executed (Karaite)=Khosrow executes [[Exilarch Haninai]] and appoints Nehemiah ben Hushiel who runs * They declared that the proto-Karaite Ma'amadkindling of the incense in the vessel with which the high priest entered the Holy of Holies on the Day of Atonement was to take place outside, so that he might be wrapped in smoke while meeting the Shekhinah within, according to Lev.=605 Phocas Persecutes Jews (Byzantine History)=Jewish refugees who had escaped Phocas arrive to seek asylum with xvi. 2; whereas the Pharisees, denying the high priest the Qurayza claim of Ercoliasuch supernatural vision, insisted that the incense be kindled within.
=610 De-Occultation of Mars (Nightsky App)=The de-occultation of Mars from beneath * They opposed the crescent moon on 2nd popular festivity of March. Khosrow's astrologers had seen the de-occultation of Mars from water libation and the Crescent moon procession preceding it on the 2nd each night of March 610 and interpreted it as meaning the right time has arrived for Sassan to go to war against Phocas. Khosrow II sends Caliph Nehemiah ben Hushiel and his Qurayza to take Syria from Phocas. The proto-Karaites and the [[Quraysh]] invade the Patriarchate of Jerusalem killing many religious Christians and succeeded in establishing themselves as Khosrow's rulers over SyriaSukkot feast.
The Jews were overjoyed and many families went to join * They opposed the Pharisaic assertion that the conquering heroes. According to scrolls of the Doctrina JacobiHoly Scriptures have, many Jews began like any holy vessel, the power to believe render ritually unclean the hands that their awaited prophet had come while others condemned Nehemiah's armiestouch them.
Their joy was short lived* They opposed the Pharisaic idea of the ''eruv'', the merging of several private precincts into one in order to admit of the carrying of food and vessels from one house to another on the Sabbath.
=617 Khosrou Betrays Israelites (Eliezer ben Qalir)=The first Hijra is when Khosrow II betrayed * In dating all civil documents they used the Israelites. Nehemiah's [[Ma'amad]] or phrase "Council after the high priest of the RighteousMost High," was evicted from and they opposed the Holy Land formula introduced by the Zoroastrian Quraysh and garrisoned themselves Pharisees in Edessa having been evicted by divorce documents, "According to the Quraysh who prevent them from access to [[Al-Masjid Al-Haram]] law of Moses and prevent the [[Noahites]] from access to [[Al-Masjid Al-Haram]]. At the same time, their Zera Israel Ishmaelite convert to Judeo-Baptist Gnosticism called Mohmot (Dead Moon) or Iyas ibn Qabisha (or perhaps Elijah ibn Abu Kabsha) seeks refuge with the Qurayza having been ousted from Al-Hira by Azadbeh".
=619 Irruption * Ben Sira, one of the Saracens (New Advent)Deuterocanonical books, is believed by many scholars to have been by a Sadducee {{Fact|date="The irruption of the Saracens" of Khosrow II in EgyptFebruary 2007}}. The Alexandrian St. John the Almsgiver (609 or 619) had taken a letter from Arsas with his own handNote, and the Talmud says clearly he was only prevented rejected by the irruption of the Saracens (619Sadducees.) from using it to obtain the deposition of Sergius.
=622 New Era (Nimusmatics)=Khosrow proclaims himself God Reliability of Gods and strips all religious symbolism off of his coins leaving only his own Image. This greatly upsets many Pahlavis and others. The Imperial Lion-Man Heraclius begins his campaign against Khosrou II and is declared August Heraclius even by the former citizens of Persia. Heraclius evicts the Qurayza from Edessa but offers them a stash of weapons and an Imperial Basalt Stele promising them the Desert (interpreted by the Qurayza as [https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/the-arabah Arabah]) if they can take it from Khosrow.claims ==
=620s Unite None of the writings we have about Sadducees present their own side of these controversies, and it is possible that positions attributed to "Sadducees" in Religion (Monoenergism/Sebeos/SIN)=Heraclius refutes later literature are meant as rhetorical foils for whatever opinion the Acephali author wishes to present, and decrees all people do not in his empire should unite in religion under his own version fact represent the teachings of the sect. Yet, although these texts were written long after these periods, many scholars have said that they are a fairly reliable account of Monophsitism which he calls Monoenergismhistory during the Second Temple era.
The Qurayza raised [[Mehmet the Ishmaelite]] into to Mahmoudan status and so that he can join their [[mamed]] as a Mahmoud. The Qurayza help him to conquer the Zoroastrian Quraysh hoping that he has the influence to raise an army of [[Hagarim]] in Tachkastan for them to take the Arabah.
It seems == Origin ==They were mainly Nabatean Ishmaelite Hagarim converted to Judaism by Alexander Jannaeus.<ref>Johnson, Paul (1987). A History of the Jews. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson. ISBN 978-0-297-79091-4.</ref> Having been freed by a Kohen they were all counted as his legal children. Where exactly Alexander Jannaeus got the idea for his religion is uncertain. Josephus relates that the three "sects" — the Pharisees, Essenes, and Sadducees — dated back to "very ancient times" (Ant. xviii. 1, § 2), which really only Uthman is genuinely convinced by Gabriel's teachingspoint to a time prior to John Hyrcanus (ib. xiii. 8, § 6) or the Maccabean war (ib. xiii. 5, § 9).
=625 Honorius Among the rabbis of the second century the following legend circulated: Antigonus of Soko, successor of Simeon the Just (219–199 BCE), the last of the Men of the Great Assembly, and consequently living at the time of the influx of Hellenistic ideas, taught the maxim, "Be not like servants who serve their master for the sake of a reward, but be rather like those who serve without thought of receiving a reward" (Church HistoryAvot 1:3)=Honorius I becomes Pope on ; whereupon two of his disciples, Zadok and Boethusius, mistaking the high ethical purport of the maxim, arrived at the conclusion that there was no future retribution, saying, "What servant would work all day without obtaining his due reward in the evening?" Instantly they broke away from the Law and lived in great luxury, using many silver and gold vessels at their banquets; and they established schools which declared the enjoyment of this life to be the goal of man, at the same time pitying the 27th Pharisees for their bitter privation in this world with no hope of Octoberanother world to compensate them. These two schools were called, after their founders, Sadducees and Boethusians.
Mithrean Ali marries FatimaChristian traditions state that the Sadducees began as a Samaritan sect.
=627 Massacre of Qurayza (SIN)=New Testament/Greek Scriptures==According to The Sadducees are mentioned in the Standard Muslim Narrative, [[Mehmet New Testament/Greek Scriptures of the Ishmaelite]] kills all male Qurayza and distributes their females as slaves to his menChristian Bible. However, this news does The Gospel of Matthew indicates that the Sadducees did not seem to reach Sebeosbelieve in the resurrection of the dead. {{bibleref|Matthew|22:29}}, 31-32 says:
It is likely that Mehmet takes :<sup>29</sup> In reply Jesus said to them: “You are mistaken, because you know neither the Scriptures nor the power of God ... [30] ... <sup>31</sup> As regards the resurrection of the black Stele at this time and dead, did this you not read what was spoken to pay for his army with weaponsyou by God, women saying, <sup>32</sup> ‘I am the God of Abraham and the God of Isaac and other spoilsthe God of Jacob’? He is the God, not of the dead, but of the living.”
Mahmoud changes Heraclius's words towards The Acts of the Apostles likewise indicates that Sadducees did not share the Pharisees’ belief in a resurrection; Paul starts a conflict during his own idea trial, by claiming that whatever his originaccusers were motivated by his advocacy of the doctrine of the resurrection (in an aside, Ieso had one Human will (MonothelitismActs 23:8 asserts that “The Sadducees say that there is no resurrection, or angel, or spirit; but the Pharisees acknowledge all three”).
Heraclius likely ==Sadducees as Ishmaelites==Being associated closely with the Temple in Jerusalem, after the Temple was unconscious of destroyed in AD 70 the Sadducees remained only as Ishmaelites. It is possible that they may have attempted to establish the Kaaba in Mecca as a substitute Temple surviving as a minority group within Judaism up until early medieval times.In the 7th century the conflict between the Ishmaelites and the difference Karaties and happy that he had more allies attacking [[Edumeans]] gave rise to Islam. In refutations of Sadducean beliefs, [[Karaite Jewish]] Sages such as Ya'akov al-Qirqisani quoted one of their texts, which was called ''Sefer Zadok''. Translations into English of some of these quotes can be found in [https://www.calledoutbelievers.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/1937_cahn_riseOfTheKaraiteSect_text.pdf Zvi Cahn's ''"Rise of the Sassanians for himKaraite sect"''].
=629 Battle of Mu-tah (SIN)=Messianic Sadducees==Mehmet's men seem to attack the ZoroastrianThe 634-ruled Ghassanids 644CE Sadducee leader of Tachkastan called [[Emir Ambrus]] adopted a Monophysite belief in Jesus as a tripartite manifestation of the battle Archangel Metatron and subsequently some of Mu-tah, Jordanthe Mishnah which Jesus promoted and which Emir Ambrus therefore incorporated into the Sadducee texts. His successor was a Manichean who abolished the original Sadducee texts in favour of a redacted version.
Heraclius interviews Quraysh concerning Mahmouda ibn Ishmael. Quraysh decide to submit to Mehmet and Heraclius orders the Ghassanids to submit to Mehmet.==See also==*[[Sefer Zadok]]
=630 Al-Karak (Hagopian/SIN)=Heraclius and his allies defeat Quraysh and enter Jerusalem on March 21 with the "True Cross".Footnotes==
Last remnant of Zoroastrian Quraysh surrender Makah to [[Mehmet]].<references/>
Arabs take Al-Karak =632 Rise of the Bakr (SIN)=Yazdegard suffers raids from the proto-Karaite Bakr family who rule from Al-Hira.Aisha is the Arabic form of the Hebrew word for wife. The word might actually refer to Rayhana Bint Zayd of the Qurayza. She poisons Mehmet and tells everyone that his last words indicate that he was a false prophet. Abu Bakr takes control of his community.The population become suspicious and hostile towards the Bakr family. External links=633 Khalid conquers Al-Hira (SIN)=The Bakr of Al-Hira appeal to Khalid's *[[Quraysh]] for help. Khalid's Quraysh conquer Al-Hira's Taji of [[Mehmet]].The Mithrean Alids soon begin minting Persian coins.=634 Tayyaye d'MHMT (Thomas the Presbyter)=The Taji of [[Mehmet]] stationed 12 miles east of Gaza fall under the control of Khalid who orders them to fight the Romans at this time as they try to re-take the lands for the Saracens which the Saracens had only just recently lost to Heraclius.=635 Nasrani-Monothelitism & Alliance (SINhttp:/Vatican/Military History)=In 635 Yazdegrd made an alliance with Heraclius in Tachkastan against the Quraysh. The Standard Islamic Narrative (SIN) states that Pope Honorius I accepted the Arab religion. In fact he only supported Nasrani-Monothelitism in a letter dated to this year. The Echo or historical kernal behind the SIN reveals more to us about the nature of Proto-Islam than it does concerning Honorius's heresy. The new religion must be Nasrani-Monothelitism which regardless of Church apologetics must therefore only logically mean the "Arian-like" doctrine that the one and only will that Ieso had was a regular human will. It is likely that Pope Honorius was aware of the Saracen raids of 629,630 and 634 and aware that Byzantium was unable to engage in any more wars and that Nasrani-Monothelitism was probably the only practical solution for the time. But Heraclius was Eutychian at heart and was reluctant to abandon his position until it was already too late.Maximus is alleged to have tried to explain that when Honorius taught "one human will in Ieso" it was only to deny the existence of any lower will of the flesh but this was taken as meaning that Ieso only had a common human will alone. This kernel grew into Islam as we now know it.=636 Heraclius defeated (Fredgar)=Yazdegard betrayed Heraclius by surrendering to Quraysh. Under the Quraysh, a marriage is arranged between Prince Shahriyar's daughter Shahrbonu and the Mithrean Ali's son Husseyn putting him in line for the Persian Throne. Quraysh proceeded to take the Holy land until Umar came to power.=637 Sophronius surrenders Jerusalem (Georgian Church History)=The Quraysh leader Umar takes advice from Alazeena Haadu and builds a Masjin on the Temple Mount. Later the first Historical Emir seems impressed and curious concerning Miaphysitismjewishencyclopedia. =638 Heraclius capitulates (Ecthesiscom/SIN)=Heraclius surrenders Syria and submits to Nasrani-Monothelitism with the Ecthesis, stating that despite alleged miraculous origins, Ieso had only one human will exhibited when he said "not my will but thy will be done" being clearly distinct from G-d's will. This view is compatible with Judaism and accurately reflects the standard position in Quraysh Islam. The Ecthesis essentially commands the Ghassanids to submit to the Quraysh. jsp?artid=641 Constans (Byzantine Records)40&letter=Constans ascends the Byzantine throne. S&search=644 Uthman (SIN)=After the death of Umar in 644 the Quraysh are ruled by a Quraysh convert to the Judeo-Baptist Gnostic Faith called Uthman. Uthman wanted to stop the spread of Judeo-Baptist Gnostic material in other languages and tried to include many Karaite ideas. He also tried to win support from Pope Martin of Gaza. But his attempts were ultimately unsuccessful. Yazdegard III attempted an unsuccessful uprising against Uthman before fleeing with his Nestorian sons to Central Asia where he was given a Christian burial.=648 Typos Offends (Numismatics/Church History)=Tyops of Constans replaces Ecthesis. The Typos of Constans was issued to suppress discussion over Nasrani-Monothelitism. It is opposed by Quraysh as well as by Pope Martin of Gaza.Quraysh refuse to put Constans on their Drahmas.=653 Saracen Tomus (Ep. 14, PL 87, 199A, ca. 653 AD)=The Byzantines arrest Pope Martin accusing him of providing the Quraysh a 'Tomus' concerning "what they should believe" and sentence him to death. Pope Martin.Pope Martin did not instruct Uthman nor any other Quraysh concerning what they should believe concerning Ieso as Messiah because Muawiya does not have any such ideas later. But it may be that there was some kind of communique between Martin and the Alids concerning whatever they had that became Quranic materials. Otherwise, where did the Byzantines get this idea from?The available evidence does not fit the SIN that Uthman played any significant role in standardising the Quraysh Quran. In contradiction to the Quran, the Emir before Uthman did not know Ieso as Messiah and Muawiya after Uthman did not know Ieso as Messiah. If Uthman believed in the miraculously born Messiah Ieso of the Quran, then his belief must have been only a generally unknown personal one which appears did not make any impact on the Umayyads until about 30 years later. However, the charges brought against Martin show that Christian-like Quranic materials in use among the Muslims were obviously known to the Byzantines at this time but if tolerated were clearly not an Umayyad approved belief (let alone promoted) until about 30 years later during the reign of Abdul Malik. Perhaps the word Masih used in the Quran is the Hebrew word for "distracter" referring to [[Plony Yeshu HaNotzri Ben StadaSadducees Jewish Encyclopedia: Sadducees]] neither words being equated with the Christian Messia Ieso? But if that were the case, it is inconceivable that the Byzantines could imagine such a belief being approved by Pope Martin for the Saracens and they would certainly have charged Martin with apostasy instead. Then perhaps the communication suggested by the Byzantines only involved Monothelite Maronite Nasara as the subjects of the Umayyad state? But if that were the case, there is no known Tomus which the Byzantines could have been referring to, and surely Martin could have made an attempt to explain this in his defence. One could concoct an imaginary drama where the first historical Emir ordered translations to know if Ieso in the New Testament was the same person as *[[Plony Yeshu HaNotzri Ben Stada]] then Uthman sent texts to Martin for his opinion on Yeshu HaNotzri, but the discourse ended when Martin pointed out that the Christian Jesus and Yeshu HaNotzri must be two different people then Muawiya spoke the way he did because he knew that there was no relation between the twohttp://www. But again one would wonder why Martin makes no reference to such helpful evidence as part of his defencenewadvent. Or one might instead imagine that the first historical Emir just wanted to know what Plony Ben Stada had learned from the Injeel, but then any basis for communication between Uthman and Martin collapses and the Byzantine charge must relate to a communique between Martin and Mulims other than the Umayyadsorg/cathen/13323a. The simplest conclusion is that while the Umayyad state may very well have accepted [[Plony Yeshu HaNotzri Ben Stadahtm Catholic Encyclopedia: Sadducees]] as a Hebrew Masih (distracter) it was not the Umayyads who had any kind of communication with Pope Martin concerning their Tomus. The SIN concerning the Uthmanic Quran Controversy must therefore be considered "Fake News". The Umayyads must have been introduced to such Quranic materials from a source other than Uthman and at a much later date.If Uthman was a believer in Quranic materials then it was not something he boasted about to other Umayyads and if there was any communication between Uthman and Pope Martin then Uthman did it secretly and his "Quran" was likely just some materials which he had taken from the [*[Mithrean Alids]].=655 Battle of Masts (A J Deus)=United Quraysh conquer the Mediterranean following Maximus the confessor's journey to Rome.After they finished their conquests, their Caliphate consisted of 7 provinceshttp:*Levant*Arabia*Egypt*Africa*Indo-Persia*Central-Eurasia*Andalusia=656 Ali (SIN)=Ali becomes Caliph except over Syria where Muawiya has seceded.Uthman appointed Ali his successor when he died but the Bakr family tried to prevent Ali's Ulu l-Amr from becoming Persia's rulers//www. Although Ulu l-Amr was not overthrown, western Quraysh under Muawiya seceded Syria from the Empire1911encyclopedia. Quraysh and Iraq's Bakr family allies go to war against the Alids in the Battle of the Camel. Ali defeats Bakr family conquering Iraq but the Quraysh retain an independent kingdom in Syria.=659=Muawiya makes a three year treaty with Byzantium."If you wish, he said, to preserve your life in safety, abandon that vain cult which you learned from childhood. Deny that Jesus and turn to the great God whom I worship, the God of our father Abraham. Dismiss from your presence the multitude of your troops to their respective lands. And I shall make you a great prince in your regions and send prefects to your cities. I shall make an inventory of the treasures and order them to be divided into four partsorg/Sadducees Encyclopedia Britannica: three for me, and one for you. I shall provide you with as many soldiers as you may wish, and take tribute from you, as much as you are able to give. But if you do not, that Jesus whom you call Christ, since he was unable to save himself from the Jews, how can he save you from my hands?"The language reminds of the Emir's reluctance to hear mention of Jesus as Christ when he asked John of the Sedre to translate the New Testament. But unlike the Emir who did not want mention of the crucifixion, it does not hint of Jesus being saved from death at all and in fact lacks any kind of respect towards Jesus. While the Emir could be a proto-Karaite because he does not seem to be aware of two different Jesuses, the words of Muawiya are much more similar to the sort of thing modern Karaites might say who recognize the difference between Jesus and the Karaite [[Plony Yeshu HaNotzri Ben StadaSadducees]]. Were it not for the fact that the Quraysh had built a shrine on the temple mount, one might easily have come to the conclusion that (with the possible exception of Uthman) the Quraysh were still pagans until Abdul Malik.This also contradicts with the idea that Quraysh were Monothelites rather than completely non-Christian. It looks more like they simply had a treaty with Monothelites rather than with other Christians. How is it then that Monothelitism (one human will) became the standard Islamic doctrine?If the first historical Emir did not consider Ieso to be Messiah and then the third (Muawiya) didn't either, it is rather inconceivable that the standard narrative concerning the Quraysh Quran collection could be true. Muawiya had either never heard what Uthman's Quran says or he was an apostate from Uthman's religion who warred against the Alids. In conclusion it is safe to say that the Quranic materials were not held by the first historical Emir's daughter (Hafsa) nor assembled into the Quraysh Quran by any caliph after him before Muawiya.The only conclusion is that the Quranic materials were only popular in the area of the Alids into whose religion Abdul Malik almost converted but also incorporated his Maronites' Nasrani-Monothelite Christology.=660 Muawiya (SIN)=Death of AliAli was followed by Husseyn which is when the Quraysh saw their opportunity and had Husseyn killed to established themselves on the throne instead. That lead to a civil war. Muawiya won but agreed that Husseyn would be his successor as king of the Arabs.=660s Rise of Muawiya (Numismatics)=Ali and Hassan killed. Sebeos indicates that the Caliphate is a satellite of the Antichrist and depicts Muawiya as rejecting Christ, but according to other sources, Muawiya's daughter was baptised. He also prayed at the tomb of Mary in Gethsemane and at the Church of the Holy Sepulchre after being entering alliance with Byzantines and being crowned king of Jerusalem It seems Muawiya, despite his earlier beliefs was a convert to something recognisable as Christianity.=669?=Hassan's Khosrow-style "in the name of the king" coins in Pahlavi and Arabic.(source currently lost)=670 (SIN)=Hassan dies and Persia falls to Muawiya.=679=Byzantium conquers Umayyads.=680 Ibn Al-Zubayir (Numismatics)=Muawiya dies. Muawiya's son like the rest of the Quraysh did not honour the acknowledgment of Husseyn as Caliph and have Husseyn killed leaving the Alid Mithreans almost extinct.Muawiya's capitulation to Byzantium and the murder of Hussein lead to the rebellion of most of the Empire under the Bakr family led by ibn Al-Zubayr as Persian Emperor. While the Bakr family Caliph ibn Al-Zubayir opposes Quraysh, John Maron is sent to clean up the Maronite heresy of Nasrani-Monothelitism among the Umayyads.=692 Iconoclasm (Numismatics)=Western Quraysh (Umayyad) Abdul Malik crushes the Bakr family killing Ibn Al-Zubayir and his mother Asma.The Quinisext Council of Trullo causes Abdul Malik to adopt Iconoclasm so as not to be accused of being one who tramples the cross as all Christians did before this year. Nevertheless, Abdul Malik supported John of Daylam.The Proto-Karaites are crushed.=699 Abu Hanifa (SIN)=Birth of Abu Hanifa.=711 Bardanes (Church History)=Philippicus Bardanes attempts to rehabilitate Nasrani-Monothelitism to counter the development of Islam.=713 4th Imam (SIN)=Death of the Rightful Persian Emperor 4th Imam Ali son of Hussein and Shahrbonu.=735 Mamed (John of Damascus)=John of Damascus writes about a [[mamed]].=749 Eastern Quraysh (SIN)=Eastern Quraysh (Abbasids) take control as the Abbasids.=763 Abu Hanifa (Karaite)=Abbasid Caliph Al-Mansur locks Proto-Karaites like [[Anan I ben David]] in prison where [[Abu Hanifa]] teaches him how to establish Karaite Judaism.
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/bpilant613/public_html/w/extensions/MobileFrontend/includes/diff/InlineDiffFormatter.php:59) in /home/bpilant613/public_html/w/includes/WebResponse.php on line 42
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/bpilant613/public_html/w/extensions/MobileFrontend/includes/diff/InlineDiffFormatter.php:59) in /home/bpilant613/public_html/w/includes/WebResponse.php on line 42
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/bpilant613/public_html/w/extensions/MobileFrontend/includes/diff/InlineDiffFormatter.php:59) in /home/bpilant613/public_html/w/includes/WebResponse.php on line 42
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/bpilant613/public_html/w/extensions/MobileFrontend/includes/diff/InlineDiffFormatter.php:59) in /home/bpilant613/public_html/w/includes/WebResponse.php on line 42 Changes - Wikinoah English
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/bpilant613/public_html/w/extensions/MobileFrontend/includes/diff/InlineDiffFormatter.php:59) in /home/bpilant613/public_html/w/includes/WebResponse.php on line 42
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/bpilant613/public_html/w/extensions/MobileFrontend/includes/diff/InlineDiffFormatter.php:59) in /home/bpilant613/public_html/w/includes/WebResponse.php on line 42
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/bpilant613/public_html/w/extensions/MobileFrontend/includes/diff/InlineDiffFormatter.php:59) in /home/bpilant613/public_html/w/includes/WebResponse.php on line 42
