The available evidence does not fit the SIN that Uthman played any significant role in standardising the Quraysh Quran. In contradiction to the Quran, the Emir before Uthman did not know Ieso as Messiah and Muawiya after Uthman did not know Ieso as Messiah. If Uthman believed in the miraculously born Messiah Ieso of the Quran, then his belief must have been only a generally unknown personal one which appears did not make any impact on the Umayyads until about 30 years later. The SIN concerning the Uthmanic Quran Controversy must therefore be considered "Fake News". However, Christian-like Quranic materials in use among the Muslims were known to the Byzantines at this time but if tolerated were clearly not an Umayyad approved belief (let alone promoted) until about 30 years later during the reign of Abdul Malik. Perhaps the word Masih used in the Quran is the Hebrew word for "talker" referring to [[Plony Yeshu HaNotzri Ben Stada]] neither words being equated with the Christian Messia Ieso? But if that were the case, it is inconceivable that the Byzantines could imagine such a belief being approved by Pope Martin for the Saracens. Perhaps the communication suggested by the Byzantines only involved Monothelite Maronite Nasara being only the subhjects of the Umayyad state? But if that were the case, there is no known Tomus which the Byzantines referring to. One could concoct an imaginary drama where the first historical Emir wanted to know if the Messiah in the New Testament was the same person as [[Plony Yeshu HaNotzri Ben Stada]] then Uthman sent texts to Martin his opinion on Yeshu HaNotzri, then Martin pointed out that the Christian Jesus and Yeshu HaNotzri must be two different people then Muawiya spoke the way he did because he knew that there was no relation between the two. But one would wonder why Martin makes no reference to such helpful evidence as part of his defence. The only rational simplest conclusion is that while the Umayyad state may very well have accepted [[Plony Yeshu HaNotzri Ben Stada]] as a Hebrew Masih (distracter) it was not the Umayyads who had any kind of communication with Pope Martin concerning their Tomus. The Umayyads they must have been introduced to such Quranic materials from a source other than Uthman and at a much later date.
