The available evidence does not fit the SIN that Uthman played any significant role in standardising the Quraysh Quran. In contradiction to the Quran, the Emir before Uthman did not know Ieso as Messiah and Muawiya after Uthman did not know Ieso as Messiah. If Uthman believed in the miraculously born Messiah Ieso of the Quran, then his belief must have been only a generally unknown personal one which appears did not make any impact on the Umayyads until about 30 years later. The SIN concerning the Uthmanic Quran Controversy must therefore be considered "Fake News". However, Christian-like Quranic materials in use among the Muslims were known to the Byzantines at this time but if tolerated were clearly not an Umayyad approved belief (let alone promoted) until about 30 years later during the reign of Abdul Malik. Perhaps the word Masih used in the Quran is the Hebrew word for "talker" referring to [[Plony Yeshu HaNotzri Ben Stada]] neither words being equated with the Christian Messia Ieso? But if that were the case, it is inconceivable that the Byzantines could imagine such a belief being approved by Pope Martin for the Saracens. The only rational conclusion is that while the Umayyad state may have accepted [[Plony Yeshu HaNotzri Ben Stada]] as a Hebrew Masih (distracter) it was not the Umayyads who had any kind of communication with Pope Martin concerning their Tomus. The Umayyads they must have been introduced to the such Quranic Materials materials from a source other than Uthman. UNLESS, the word Masih used in the Quran is the Hebrew word for Talker and should not be equated with the word Messiahat a much later date.
