Difference between revisions of "Noahite Christian Gnostic"

From Wikinoah English
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(85 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
The Taji (tʾcyk') of Tachkastan were a sect of Essenes ([[Judeo-Baptist]] [[Gnostics]]) from the Formerly Roman Province of Tachkastan which was conquered by the Persians in 610AD. The Manicheans had seceded from them under the influence of Marcionism and Mandaeism.  
+
=The Gentile Gnostic Question=
 +
Gentile Gnosticism ([[Christian Gnosticism]]) like that of the Marcionites, Valentinians, Mandaeans, and Manicheans presents a complex problem. A certain amount of Jewish Kabbalah found its way into 2nd century Christianity which completed what it didn't know in the most anti-Semitic ways because they lacked understanding concerning the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil and dumbed it down into the Tree of Gnosis. Everything else followed on from that one simple mistake.
  
−
They did not consider themselves Arabs but spoke Quraysh, an Arabic dialect inflienced by Imperial Aramaic which they called Intelligible Arabic to distinguish it from the common language spoken by Arabs.  
+
Gentile Gnostics identified the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob as the Demiurge (the Gnostic Devil) and many Gentile Gnostics looked upon joining the Noahites as a decision to worship the Gentile-Gnostic Devil.
  
−
The Taji were Judeo-Baptist Gnostics who unlike Gentile Gnostics equated the God of Abraham Isaac and Jacob with God the Father on High rather than with the Demiurge who they equated with Satan. They believed that Rebbe Yehoshuah Minzaret (whom they called Ieso) was actually a threefold Aeon (Rasul) called Mitra (Mitatrun) who looks like a human but was not really a human being at all. They believed that the same Aeon had visited the planet many times before such as for example as [[Abraham's Visitors]]. The Aeon called Mahamadim (Ahmed) united within itself, Mahmad the Suffering Temple Word alongside Ieso the Guiding Spiritual Light.  
+
To avoid that mistake, in order purify Gentile Gnosticism from its mistakes into a form of Noahite Gnosticism it must first be redacted and baptized in Jewish Gnosis.
  
−
=610=
+
To that end it is therefore necessary to reject some of the Gentile Gnostic ideas and clarify that the Gentile-Gnostic Devil (the Demiurge) described in Gentile-Gnosticism as a serpent with the head of a lion must be identified with the fallen angel Samael, the serpent in the Garden of Eden who rules Assiah (the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil) and who traps the divine sparks of Adam and Eve within his sphere of influence by polluting them in order to bring life to his creations. Hence the High God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob had to exile mankind from Yetzirah to Assiah but clothed them in skins out of pity.
−
After defeating the Romans in 610, the [[Ercolian Karaites]] who had settled in [https://goo.gl/maps/dMAJG1ohZ7baeW3z8 Mamuca] did not allow the Taji access to [[Al-Masjid Al-Haram]] in Jerusalem.  
 
  
−
=620s=
+
=Gnostic Noahites=
−
'''Gabriel of the Taji''' came from Heraclius announcing the decree from on high to unite in religion. They were supported by various Pahlavi families. The [[Ercolian Karaites]] thought they could use this to their advantage and went from Edessa to Tachkastan where their Ma'amad, Mehmet, Muhmad, Mahmud established an alliance with the Taji in 622.
+
Unlike Gentile Gnostics the Gnostic Noahites equated the God of Abraham Isaac and Jacob with the Gnostic God the Father on High rather than with the Demiurge who they like all Noahites equated with Satan.  
  
−
=636=
+
Gnostic Noahites did not consider themselves Arabs (9:97) but spoke an Arabic dialect influenced by Imperial Aramaic which they called Intelligible Arabic (16:103) to distinguish it from the common Quraysh language spoken by Muslim Arabs (49:14).  
−
The Taji made an alliance with [[Al-Lahazim]] in 636 through Shahrbonu and converted Uthman of the [[Ercolian Karaites]] to their religion.  
 
  
−
=644=
+
Gnostic Noahites welcomed Zera-Israel (Bani Israel) who rejected any Nasrani and Judean claims to Abraham.  
−
Uthman came to power and promoted the Quran much to the annoyance of his family and other [[Ercolian Karaites]].  
 
  
−
=656=
+
Gnostic Noahites called themselves "Mursalin" meaning "Aeonists" (2:252); they called their followers Believers (2:62); and recognized their common ground with [[Alazeena Haadu]]; and with other Noahites (Sabi); and especially (5:82) with Ebionite-like Jewish Messianists (Notsari); but referred to Minim as Judases (5:64). They allowed their followers to marry women from [[the Bible Community]].
−
Uthman appointed Ali as his successor. The [[Ercolian Karaites]] went to war against the Taji & Al-Lahazim but the Taji & Al-Lahazim won.
 
  
−
=660=
+
They themselves rejected Messiah-Sonship and Ezrakh-sonship but believed instead only in aeon-sonship seeing Rebbe Yehoshuah Minzaret (whom they called Ieso) as actually a threefold (4:171) Aeon (Rasul) called Mitra (Mitatrun) who only looked like a son of man but was not really a human being at all. They believed that the same Aeon (Mitatrun) had visited the planet many times before such as for example as [[Abraham's Visitors]]. This Aeon (Mitatrun) whom they called Ahmed (Mahamadim) or the Bridegroom united ''within'' itself, Mahmad the Suffering Temple Word alongside Ieso the Guiding Spiritual Light. Ieso gave up Ahmed to his Talmidim as the Shirayim of Seudah shlishit Hitveadut for Melaveh Malka (Al-Maeda). So Ahmed (Rasulallah) was not crucified while Ieso and his shadow (as per John of Damascus) or appearance (as per 4:157) i.e. Mahmad (as per 3:144) were crucified instead.
−
The Taji ruled until 660 when they were overthrown by the [[Ercolian Karaites]] again. The terms of the peace treaty promised that the Taji & Al-Lahazim Candidate (Hussein) would rule following Muawiya.  
 
  
−
=680=
+
The critics of the Noahite Gnostics used to accuse them of Sabellian-Modalism to which the Noahite Gnostics responded that it is truly an act of disbelief to say that The Divine Father is the Messianic Aeon, asking who could it be that would have something over the Divine Father by willing that the Messianic Aeon should die? (5:17)
−
The [[Ercolian Karaites]] did not keep their promise and killed the Taji & Al-Lahazim Candidate. Hence the Al-Lahazim established ibn Al-Zubayir as their ruler while the Taji fled first to Armenia then Thrace.
 
  
−
The Taji still survive today as the Tzigane of Biharia.
+
The critics of the Noahite Gnostics also used to accuse them of Tritheism, to which they responded that there is no god beside One God the Divine Father, the Almighty but that God's Aeon should be obeyed.
 +
 
 +
The Noahite Gnostics also tried hard to fight against the doctrine of Adoptionism.
 +
 
 +
The Gnostic Noahites felt very hurt that the reasoning behind these doctrines were turned inside out by the Caliphs and not very wowed by Uthman's Quran which did not do justice to Gnostic Noahite beliefs. Hence many became Maronites while others became Pavlikeni.

Latest revision as of 23:38, 14 July 2021

The Gentile Gnostic Question

Gentile Gnosticism (Christian Gnosticism) like that of the Marcionites, Valentinians, Mandaeans, and Manicheans presents a complex problem. A certain amount of Jewish Kabbalah found its way into 2nd century Christianity which completed what it didn't know in the most anti-Semitic ways because they lacked understanding concerning the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil and dumbed it down into the Tree of Gnosis. Everything else followed on from that one simple mistake.

Gentile Gnostics identified the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob as the Demiurge (the Gnostic Devil) and many Gentile Gnostics looked upon joining the Noahites as a decision to worship the Gentile-Gnostic Devil.

To avoid that mistake, in order purify Gentile Gnosticism from its mistakes into a form of Noahite Gnosticism it must first be redacted and baptized in Jewish Gnosis.

To that end it is therefore necessary to reject some of the Gentile Gnostic ideas and clarify that the Gentile-Gnostic Devil (the Demiurge) described in Gentile-Gnosticism as a serpent with the head of a lion must be identified with the fallen angel Samael, the serpent in the Garden of Eden who rules Assiah (the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil) and who traps the divine sparks of Adam and Eve within his sphere of influence by polluting them in order to bring life to his creations. Hence the High God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob had to exile mankind from Yetzirah to Assiah but clothed them in skins out of pity.

Gnostic Noahites

Unlike Gentile Gnostics the Gnostic Noahites equated the God of Abraham Isaac and Jacob with the Gnostic God the Father on High rather than with the Demiurge who they like all Noahites equated with Satan.

Gnostic Noahites did not consider themselves Arabs (9:97) but spoke an Arabic dialect influenced by Imperial Aramaic which they called Intelligible Arabic (16:103) to distinguish it from the common Quraysh language spoken by Muslim Arabs (49:14).

Gnostic Noahites welcomed Zera-Israel (Bani Israel) who rejected any Nasrani and Judean claims to Abraham.

Gnostic Noahites called themselves "Mursalin" meaning "Aeonists" (2:252); they called their followers Believers (2:62); and recognized their common ground with Alazeena Haadu; and with other Noahites (Sabi); and especially (5:82) with Ebionite-like Jewish Messianists (Notsari); but referred to Minim as Judases (5:64). They allowed their followers to marry women from the Bible Community.

They themselves rejected Messiah-Sonship and Ezrakh-sonship but believed instead only in aeon-sonship seeing Rebbe Yehoshuah Minzaret (whom they called Ieso) as actually a threefold (4:171) Aeon (Rasul) called Mitra (Mitatrun) who only looked like a son of man but was not really a human being at all. They believed that the same Aeon (Mitatrun) had visited the planet many times before such as for example as Abraham's Visitors. This Aeon (Mitatrun) whom they called Ahmed (Mahamadim) or the Bridegroom united within itself, Mahmad the Suffering Temple Word alongside Ieso the Guiding Spiritual Light. Ieso gave up Ahmed to his Talmidim as the Shirayim of Seudah shlishit Hitveadut for Melaveh Malka (Al-Maeda). So Ahmed (Rasulallah) was not crucified while Ieso and his shadow (as per John of Damascus) or appearance (as per 4:157) i.e. Mahmad (as per 3:144) were crucified instead.

The critics of the Noahite Gnostics used to accuse them of Sabellian-Modalism to which the Noahite Gnostics responded that it is truly an act of disbelief to say that The Divine Father is the Messianic Aeon, asking who could it be that would have something over the Divine Father by willing that the Messianic Aeon should die? (5:17)

The critics of the Noahite Gnostics also used to accuse them of Tritheism, to which they responded that there is no god beside One God the Divine Father, the Almighty but that God's Aeon should be obeyed.

The Noahite Gnostics also tried hard to fight against the doctrine of Adoptionism.

The Gnostic Noahites felt very hurt that the reasoning behind these doctrines were turned inside out by the Caliphs and not very wowed by Uthman's Quran which did not do justice to Gnostic Noahite beliefs. Hence many became Maronites while others became Pavlikeni.

Retrieved from "http://www.wikinoah.org/en/index.php?title=Noahite_Christian_Gnostic&oldid=22290"