Difference between revisions of "Noahite Christian Gnostic"

From Wikinoah English
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(141 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Quraysh''' was the name for the '''Association of Sassan-Achaemenid Nobles'''.
+
=The Gentile Gnostic Question=
 +
Gentile Gnosticism ([[Christian Gnosticism]]) like that of the Marcionites, Valentinians, Mandaeans, and Manicheans presents a complex problem. A certain amount of Jewish Kabbalah found its way into 2nd century Christianity which completed what it didn't know in the most anti-Semitic ways because they lacked understanding concerning the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil and dumbed it down into the Tree of Gnosis. Everything else followed on from that one simple mistake.
  
The Association suffered a feud when many members were converted into [[Noahite Gnostic Worshippers]] by the [[Judeo-Baptist]] [[Gnostic]] [[Gabriel of Tachkastan]]'s star student [[Ma'amad ibn Ishmael]] who translated the materials into the Quraysh dialect for the Sassan-Achamenids.  
+
Gentile Gnostics identified the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob as the Demiurge (the Gnostic Devil) and many Gentile Gnostics looked upon joining the Noahites as a decision to worship the Gentile-Gnostic Devil.
  
The Quraysh were probably Zoroastrian. Either way they respected the about 360 (365 to be precise) Idols (one for each day of the year) which they placed in the Kaabah. Christian Gnostics assigned the origination of these as the Demiurge and his demons. By smashing them the Noahites were trying to prove to the Christian Gnostics that they had something in common.
+
To avoid that mistake, in order purify Gentile Gnosticism from its mistakes into a form of Noahite Gnosticism it must first be redacted and baptized in Jewish Gnosis.
  
Father Kabsha's Son is also referred to in Islamic sources as having been a member of the Quraysh (Association) because of Tachkastan's relationship to the "ignorant Arab" (identified by A.J. Deus as Ilyas/Iyas ibn Qabisa) that Khosrow II appointed to rule Lakhmidia was in the Association of Persian Nobles.  
+
To that end it is therefore necessary to reject some of the Gentile Gnostic ideas and clarify that the Gentile-Gnostic Devil (the Demiurge) described in Gentile-Gnosticism as a serpent with the head of a lion must be identified with the fallen angel Samael, the serpent in the Garden of Eden who rules Assiah (the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil) and who traps the divine sparks of Adam and Eve within his sphere of influence by polluting them in order to bring life to his creations. Hence the High God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob had to exile mankind from Yetzirah to Assiah but clothed them in skins out of pity.
  
Islamic sources indicate that this Association was based in Makah (originally spelled with one k).  
+
=Gnostic Noahites=
 +
Unlike Gentile Gnostics the Gnostic Noahites equated the God of Abraham Isaac and Jacob with the Gnostic God the Father on High rather than with the Demiurge who they like all Noahites equated with Satan.  
  
The earliest available description of the location of Makah identifies it with the area of Al-Anbar in the Mesopotamian desert between [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Khalidiya,_Iraq Al-Kaldiya] and Carra.
+
Gnostic Noahites did not consider themselves Arabs (9:97) but spoke an Arabic dialect influenced by Imperial Aramaic which they called Intelligible Arabic (16:103) to distinguish it from the common Quraysh language spoken by Muslim Arabs (49:14).  
  
Two events mentioned in the Islamic Quran that seem possible to use for dating his conversion are the defeat of the Romans presumably by Khosrau in chapter 30 verse 2 and the splitting of the moon mentioned in 54:1. Both occurred in 610AD. The occultation adds more reason behind the adoption of the Sasanian Star and Crescent as a symbol for Islam.  
+
Gnostic Noahites welcomed Zera-Israel (Bani Israel) who rejected any Nasrani and Judean claims to Abraham.  
  
The Quraysh made an alliance with the House of Hashem by arranging the marriage between Prince Shahriyar's daughter Shahrbonu and Ali's son Husseyn. The union established the agreement that Ali would become Persia's King of Kings after the death of Yazdegard followed by Hassan, but Muawiya had them killed and established himself on the throne instead leading to a civil war whereby it was settled that Husseyn would succeed him as king of the Arabs. However, Muawiya's son did not honour the arrangement and had Husseyn killed leading to the rebellion of the Bakr tribe under the leadership of ibn Al-Zubayr.  
+
Gnostic Noahites called themselves "Mursalin" meaning "Aeonists" (2:252); they called their followers Believers (2:62); and recognized their common ground with [[Alazeena Haadu]]; and with other Noahites (Sabi); and especially (5:82) with Ebionite-like Jewish Messianists (Notsari); but referred to Minim as Judases (5:64). They allowed their followers to marry women from [[the Bible Community]].
  
Abdul-Malik crushed ibn Al-Zubayir but made more concessions to the Arabs.
+
They themselves rejected Messiah-Sonship and Ezrakh-sonship but believed instead only in aeon-sonship seeing Rebbe Yehoshuah Minzaret (whom they called Ieso) as actually a threefold (4:171) Aeon (Rasul) called Mitra (Mitatrun) who only looked like a son of man but was not really a human being at all. They believed that the same Aeon (Mitatrun) had visited the planet many times before such as for example as [[Abraham's Visitors]]. This Aeon (Mitatrun) whom they called Ahmed (Mahamadim) or the Bridegroom united ''within'' itself, Mahmad the Suffering Temple Word alongside Ieso the Guiding Spiritual Light. Ieso gave up Ahmed to his Talmidim as the Shirayim of Seudah shlishit Hitveadut for Melaveh Malka (Al-Maeda). So Ahmed (Rasulallah) was not crucified while Ieso and his shadow (as per John of Damascus) or appearance (as per 4:157) i.e. Mahmad (as per 3:144) were crucified instead.
  
The Association of Sassan-Achaemenid Nobles spoke its own Arameanized dialect of Arabic called Intelligible Arabic (as opposed to unintelligible Arabic) which Gabriel's Quranic materials would soon be translated by Uthman. While the names Ieso and Yahia are from Persian Gnosticism, the use of the word darāhima (12:20:4 ድራክማ in Amharic Դրախմա in Armenian) in the Quraysh dialect is of Byzantine origin from the word Drahma indicating that the Arabian Quraysh were people of Gnostic beliefs but who nevertheless did not live in an area that was used to using Dinars. They were certainly not Romans as they pointed out that the Romans had been defeated but since the currency was anyway the Drahma instead of the Dinar they understood that Sassanian control in their area was weak and expected that within 10 years the Romans in turn would be victorious. '''The Gnostic authors were operating in a 'down but not out' Byzantine economic sphere.''' The fact that the Sassanian-Persians are not mentioned in the final Quran is also worth deep consideration.
+
The critics of the Noahite Gnostics used to accuse them of Sabellian-Modalism to which the Noahite Gnostics responded that it is truly an act of disbelief to say that The Divine Father is the Messianic Aeon, asking who could it be that would have something over the Divine Father by willing that the Messianic Aeon should die? (5:17)
 +
 
 +
The critics of the Noahite Gnostics also used to accuse them of Tritheism, to which they responded that there is no god beside One God the Divine Father, the Almighty but that God's Aeon should be obeyed.
 +
 
 +
The Noahite Gnostics also tried hard to fight against the doctrine of Adoptionism.
 +
 
 +
The Gnostic Noahites felt very hurt that the reasoning behind these doctrines were turned inside out by the Caliphs and not very wowed by Uthman's Quran which did not do justice to Gnostic Noahite beliefs. Hence many became Maronites while others became Pavlikeni.

Latest revision as of 23:38, 14 July 2021

The Gentile Gnostic Question

Gentile Gnosticism (Christian Gnosticism) like that of the Marcionites, Valentinians, Mandaeans, and Manicheans presents a complex problem. A certain amount of Jewish Kabbalah found its way into 2nd century Christianity which completed what it didn't know in the most anti-Semitic ways because they lacked understanding concerning the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil and dumbed it down into the Tree of Gnosis. Everything else followed on from that one simple mistake.

Gentile Gnostics identified the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob as the Demiurge (the Gnostic Devil) and many Gentile Gnostics looked upon joining the Noahites as a decision to worship the Gentile-Gnostic Devil.

To avoid that mistake, in order purify Gentile Gnosticism from its mistakes into a form of Noahite Gnosticism it must first be redacted and baptized in Jewish Gnosis.

To that end it is therefore necessary to reject some of the Gentile Gnostic ideas and clarify that the Gentile-Gnostic Devil (the Demiurge) described in Gentile-Gnosticism as a serpent with the head of a lion must be identified with the fallen angel Samael, the serpent in the Garden of Eden who rules Assiah (the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil) and who traps the divine sparks of Adam and Eve within his sphere of influence by polluting them in order to bring life to his creations. Hence the High God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob had to exile mankind from Yetzirah to Assiah but clothed them in skins out of pity.

Gnostic Noahites

Unlike Gentile Gnostics the Gnostic Noahites equated the God of Abraham Isaac and Jacob with the Gnostic God the Father on High rather than with the Demiurge who they like all Noahites equated with Satan.

Gnostic Noahites did not consider themselves Arabs (9:97) but spoke an Arabic dialect influenced by Imperial Aramaic which they called Intelligible Arabic (16:103) to distinguish it from the common Quraysh language spoken by Muslim Arabs (49:14).

Gnostic Noahites welcomed Zera-Israel (Bani Israel) who rejected any Nasrani and Judean claims to Abraham.

Gnostic Noahites called themselves "Mursalin" meaning "Aeonists" (2:252); they called their followers Believers (2:62); and recognized their common ground with Alazeena Haadu; and with other Noahites (Sabi); and especially (5:82) with Ebionite-like Jewish Messianists (Notsari); but referred to Minim as Judases (5:64). They allowed their followers to marry women from the Bible Community.

They themselves rejected Messiah-Sonship and Ezrakh-sonship but believed instead only in aeon-sonship seeing Rebbe Yehoshuah Minzaret (whom they called Ieso) as actually a threefold (4:171) Aeon (Rasul) called Mitra (Mitatrun) who only looked like a son of man but was not really a human being at all. They believed that the same Aeon (Mitatrun) had visited the planet many times before such as for example as Abraham's Visitors. This Aeon (Mitatrun) whom they called Ahmed (Mahamadim) or the Bridegroom united within itself, Mahmad the Suffering Temple Word alongside Ieso the Guiding Spiritual Light. Ieso gave up Ahmed to his Talmidim as the Shirayim of Seudah shlishit Hitveadut for Melaveh Malka (Al-Maeda). So Ahmed (Rasulallah) was not crucified while Ieso and his shadow (as per John of Damascus) or appearance (as per 4:157) i.e. Mahmad (as per 3:144) were crucified instead.

The critics of the Noahite Gnostics used to accuse them of Sabellian-Modalism to which the Noahite Gnostics responded that it is truly an act of disbelief to say that The Divine Father is the Messianic Aeon, asking who could it be that would have something over the Divine Father by willing that the Messianic Aeon should die? (5:17)

The critics of the Noahite Gnostics also used to accuse them of Tritheism, to which they responded that there is no god beside One God the Divine Father, the Almighty but that God's Aeon should be obeyed.

The Noahite Gnostics also tried hard to fight against the doctrine of Adoptionism.

The Gnostic Noahites felt very hurt that the reasoning behind these doctrines were turned inside out by the Caliphs and not very wowed by Uthman's Quran which did not do justice to Gnostic Noahite beliefs. Hence many became Maronites while others became Pavlikeni.