They themselves rejected Messiah-Sonship and Ezrakh-sonship but believed instead only in aeon-sonship seeing Rebbe Yehoshuah Minzaret (whom they called Ieso) as actually a threefold (4:171) Aeon (Rasul) called Mitra (Mitatrun) who only looked like a son of man but was not really a human being at all. They believed that the same Aeon (Mitatrun) had visited the planet many times before such as for example as [[Abraham's Visitors]]. This Aeon (Mitatrun) whom they called Ahmed (Mahamadim) or the Bridegroom united ''within'' itself, Mahmad the Suffering Temple Word alongside Ieso the Guiding Spiritual Light. Ieso gave up Ahmed to his Talmidim as the Shirayim of Seudah shlishit Hitveadut for Melaveh Malka (Al-Maeda). So Ahmed (Rasulallah) was not crucified while Ieso and his shadow (as per John of Damascus) or appearance (as per 4:157) i.e. Mahmad (as per 3:144) were crucified instead.
 
The critics of the Noahite Gnostics used to accuse them of Sabellian-Modalism to which the Noahite Gnostics responded that it is truly an act of disbelief to say that The Divine Father is the Messianic Aeon, asking who could it be that would have something over the Divine Father by willing that the Messianic Aeon should die? (5:17)
=610=
Changes - Wikinoah English

Changes

Jump to: navigation, search

Noahite Christian Gnostic

335 bytes added, 22:54, 3 November 2020
Gnostic Noahites

Navigation menu