Difference between revisions of "Noahite Christian Gnostic"

From Wikinoah English
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
The Association suffered a feud when many members were converted into [[Noahite Gnostic Worshippers]] by the [[Judeo-Baptist]] [[Gnostic]] [[Gabriel of Tachkastan]]'s star student [[Ma'amad ibn Ishmael]].
 
The Association suffered a feud when many members were converted into [[Noahite Gnostic Worshippers]] by the [[Judeo-Baptist]] [[Gnostic]] [[Gabriel of Tachkastan]]'s star student [[Ma'amad ibn Ishmael]].
 
The Association of Sassan-Achaemenid Nobles spoke its own Arameanized dialect of Arabic which Gabriel's Quranic materials would soon be translated by Uthman.
 
  
 
The Quraysh may have been either Yazdean or Zoroastrian. Either way they respected the the Demiurge and the rest of the 365 Idols (one for each day of the year) which they placed in the Kaabah.
 
The Quraysh may have been either Yazdean or Zoroastrian. Either way they respected the the Demiurge and the rest of the 365 Idols (one for each day of the year) which they placed in the Kaabah.
Line 13: Line 11:
 
The earliest available description of the location of Makah identifies it with the area of Al-Anbar in the Mesopotamian desert between [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Khalidiya,_Iraq Al-Kaldiya] and Carra.
 
The earliest available description of the location of Makah identifies it with the area of Al-Anbar in the Mesopotamian desert between [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Khalidiya,_Iraq Al-Kaldiya] and Carra.
  
Two events mentioned in the Islamic Quran that seem possible to use for dating his conversion are the defeat of the Romans presumably by Khosrau in chapter 30 verse 2 and the splitting of the moon mentioned in 54:1. Both occurred in 610AD.  
+
Two events mentioned in the Islamic Quran that seem possible to use for dating his conversion are the defeat of the Romans presumably by Khosrau in chapter 30 verse 2 and the splitting of the moon mentioned in 54:1. Both occurred in 610AD. The occultation adds more reason behind the adoption of the Sasanian Star and Crescent as a symbol for Islam.  
 
 
As for the splitting of the moon, if it is was simply a Dog Moon then there will be no way to pinpoint the timing of such a meteological event.
 
 
 
It could refer instead so some kind of occultation adding more reason behind the adoption of the Sasanian Star and Crescent as a symbol for Islam.  
 
  
While the names Ieso and Yahia are from Persian Gnosticism, the use of the word darāhima (12:20:4 ድራክማ in Amharic Դրախմա in Armenian) in the Quranic materials is of Byzantine origin from the word Drahma indicating that the Quranic materials were being used by/for people of Gnostic beliefs but who nevertheless did not live in an area that was used to using Dinars. They were certainly not Romans as they pointed out that the Romans had been defeated but since the currency was anyway the Drahma instead of the Dinar they understood that Sassanian control in their area was weak and expected that within 10 years the Romans in turn would be victorious. '''The Gnostic authors were operating in a 'down but not out' Byzantine economic sphere.''' The fact that the Sassanians and Persians are not mentioned in the final Quran is also worth deep consideration.
+
The Association of Sassan-Achaemenid Nobles spoke its own Arameanized dialect of Arabic which Gabriel's Quranic materials would soon be translated by Uthman. While the names Ieso and Yahia are from Persian Gnosticism, the use of the word darāhima (12:20:4 ድራክማ in Amharic Դրախմա in Armenian) in the Quraysh dialect is of Byzantine origin from the word Drahma indicating that the Arabian Quraysh were people of Gnostic beliefs but who nevertheless did not live in an area that was used to using Dinars. They were certainly not Romans as they pointed out that the Romans had been defeated but since the currency was anyway the Drahma instead of the Dinar they understood that Sassanian control in their area was weak and expected that within 10 years the Romans in turn would be victorious. '''The Gnostic authors were operating in a 'down but not out' Byzantine economic sphere.''' The fact that the Sassanian-Persians are not mentioned in the final Quran is also worth deep consideration.

Revision as of 23:36, 26 October 2020

Quraysh was the name for the Association of Sassan-Achaemenid Nobles.

The Association suffered a feud when many members were converted into Noahite Gnostic Worshippers by the Judeo-Baptist Gnostic Gabriel of Tachkastan's star student Ma'amad ibn Ishmael.

The Quraysh may have been either Yazdean or Zoroastrian. Either way they respected the the Demiurge and the rest of the 365 Idols (one for each day of the year) which they placed in the Kaabah.

Father Kabsha's Son is also referred to in Islamic sources as having been a member of the Quraysh (Association) because of Tachkastan's relationship to the "ignorant Arab" (identified by A.J. Deus as Ilyas/Iyas ibn Qabisa) that Khosrow II appointed to rule Lakhmidia was in the Association of Persian Nobles.

Islamic sources indicate that this Association was based in Makah (originally spelled with one k).

The earliest available description of the location of Makah identifies it with the area of Al-Anbar in the Mesopotamian desert between Al-Kaldiya and Carra.

Two events mentioned in the Islamic Quran that seem possible to use for dating his conversion are the defeat of the Romans presumably by Khosrau in chapter 30 verse 2 and the splitting of the moon mentioned in 54:1. Both occurred in 610AD. The occultation adds more reason behind the adoption of the Sasanian Star and Crescent as a symbol for Islam.

The Association of Sassan-Achaemenid Nobles spoke its own Arameanized dialect of Arabic which Gabriel's Quranic materials would soon be translated by Uthman. While the names Ieso and Yahia are from Persian Gnosticism, the use of the word darāhima (12:20:4 ድራክማ in Amharic Դրախմա in Armenian) in the Quraysh dialect is of Byzantine origin from the word Drahma indicating that the Arabian Quraysh were people of Gnostic beliefs but who nevertheless did not live in an area that was used to using Dinars. They were certainly not Romans as they pointed out that the Romans had been defeated but since the currency was anyway the Drahma instead of the Dinar they understood that Sassanian control in their area was weak and expected that within 10 years the Romans in turn would be victorious. The Gnostic authors were operating in a 'down but not out' Byzantine economic sphere. The fact that the Sassanian-Persians are not mentioned in the final Quran is also worth deep consideration.